Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

GOP lawmaker accuses Jack Smith of ‘spying’ on Congress at tense House hearing over Trump probe

by admin January 23, 2026
January 23, 2026
GOP lawmaker accuses Jack Smith of ‘spying’ on Congress at tense House hearing over Trump probe

Former special counsel Jack Smith spent hours publicly defending the parameters of his investigation into President Donald Trump on Thursday in the face of sharp questions from Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee — including one lawmaker in particular who repeatedly accused Smith of ‘spying’ on certain lawmakers. 

During one of the most contentious portions of the hearing, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., pressed Smith over the so-called ‘tolling records’ Smith sought as part of the special counsel investigation, which included investigating Trump’s alleged attempts to subvert the results of the 2020 election. 

Unlike wiretaps, tolling records are phone logs that reveal the phone numbers of incoming and outgoing callers, as well as the time and duration of calls. Republicans have zeroed in on the tolling records in recent months, blasting them as an aggressive tactic by Smith and an act of ‘political weaponization,’ which Smith vehemently denied.

Issa, in particular, excoriated Smith for the decision to seek the tolling records of Republicans in the House and Senate — which he said Thursday was tantamount to spying on his political ‘enemies.’

Smith, for his part, defended the tolling records as ‘common practice’ in such investigations.

‘Maybe they’re not your political enemies, but they sure as [heck] were Joe Biden’s poltiical enemies, weren’t they?’ Issa asked Smith. ‘They were Harris’s political enemies,’ he said, referring to the former vice president. ‘They were the enemies of the president — and you were their arm, weren’t you?’ 

‘No,’ Smith said. 

‘So, you spied on the speaker of the House and these other senators and so on, and informed no one — and in fact, put a gag order in — so they couldn’t discover it,’ Issa said.

Smith attempted to respond before Issa continued. 

‘Why did Congress, a separate branch that you, under the Constitution, have to respect — why is it that no one should be informed — including the judges?’ Issa pressed. ‘As you went in to spy on these people, did you mention that you were spying on, [that you were] seeking records to you could find out about when conversations occurred between the U.S. Speaker of the House and the president?’

‘Did you inform the judge?’ Issa continued. ‘Or did you hold that back?’

‘My office didn’t spy on anyone,’ Smith said, before Issa cut back in. 

‘Wait a second,’ he interjected sharply. ‘The question I asked you, Mr. Smith, was pretty straightforward.’

Before Smith could respond again, the panel’s ranking Democrat, Rep. Jamie Raskin, interjected to address House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan. 

‘Mr. Chairman, would you please instruct the gentleman to allow the witness to answer the question?’ he said. ‘The witness has the right to answer the question.’

Smith previously said that the Public Integrity Section had signed off on the subpoenas, a point corroborated by previously released public records. Those records also showed that the Public Integrity Section told prosecutors to be wary of concerns lawmakers could raise about the Constitution’s speech or debate clause, which gives Congress members added protections.

The subpoenas to the phone companies were accompanied by gag orders blocking the lawmakers from learning about the existence of the subpoenas for at least one year.

Smith previously told the House lawmakers in a closed-door hearing that the D.C. federal court, which authorized the gag orders, would not have been aware that they applied to Congress members. 

‘I don’t think we identified that, because I don’t think that was Department policy at the time,’ Smith said.

Asked during the earlier deposition about who should be held accountable for lawmakers who felt that the seizure of a narrow set of their phone data was a constitutional violation, Smith said Trump should be held accountable.

‘These records are people, in the case of the Senators, Donald Trump directed his co-conspirators to call these people to further delay the proceedings,’ Smith said.

‘He chose to do that. If Donald Trump had chosen to call a number of Democratic senators, we would have gotten toll records for Democratic Senators. So responsibility for why these records, why we collected them, that’s — that lies with Donald Trump,’ he said at the time.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
White House baby boom in full bloom as Usha Vance, top Trump aides announce pregnancies
next post
Jim Jordan says FBI searched Barron Trump’s room during Mar-a-Lago raid at Jack Smith hearing

Related Posts

Trump celebrates conservative party win in Germany

February 24, 2025

X account racks up dozens of firings for...

September 17, 2025

House Pentagon funding bill would ban transgender treatments...

December 13, 2024

Who could lead if Zelenskyy resigned?

March 2, 2025

House committee withdraws James Comey subpoena for Jeffrey...

October 8, 2025

House GOP critics break with Trump over Venezuela...

January 4, 2026

White House plans ‘extraordinary’ Holy Week as Trump...

April 14, 2025

Shutdown crushes small business owners as losses hit...

October 28, 2025

Trump’s ‘shock and awe’: Forget first 100 days,...

January 23, 2025

DAVID MARCUS: In Harlem, excitement for Mamdani and...

November 3, 2025

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio
  • China slams Trump administration over US sanctions on Cuba
  • Minnesota fraud case is ‘canary in the coal mine’ for government systems — including elections, lawyer wars
  • House Freedom Caucus draws line on DHS, ICE funding as Minneapolis unrest fuels shutdown risk

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    January 28, 2026
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    January 28, 2026
  • China slams Trump administration over US sanctions on Cuba

    January 28, 2026
  • Minnesota fraud case is ‘canary in the coal mine’ for government systems — including elections, lawyer wars

    January 28, 2026
  • House Freedom Caucus draws line on DHS, ICE funding as Minneapolis unrest fuels shutdown risk

    January 28, 2026
  • Trump says Noem doing ‘very good job, ‘won’t step down as homeland security chief amid Minnesota shift

    January 28, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 2

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 3

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 7

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (607)
  • Investing (2,903)
  • Politics (3,558)
  • Stocks (1,052)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2026 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved