Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

124 Dems oppose historically bipartisan defense bill over restrictions on transgender treatments for minors

by admin December 12, 2024
December 12, 2024
124 Dems oppose historically bipartisan defense bill over restrictions on transgender treatments for minors

The House voted Wednesday to pass its yearly defense bill that would give junior enlisted troops a significant pay bump and work to eliminate DEI programs at the Pentagon.

It passed 281-140, with 16 Republicans voting no. Only 81 Democrats voted yes – 124 voting no – a much larger margin than in years passed when the legislation typically enjoyed bipartisan support. 

Many Democrats opposed a provision of the bill that restricts coverage of transgender treatments for minors. 

The legislation now heads to the Senate for passage before heading to President Joe Biden’s desk for signature. 

The 1,800-page bill known as the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), details how $895.2 billion allocated toward defense and national security will be spent. It will be voted on more than two months after the start of the fiscal year. 

The $895.2 billion represents a 1% increase over last year’s budget, a smaller number than some defense hawks would have liked. 

A significant portion of the legislation focused on quality-of-life improvements for service members amid record recruitment issues, a focus of much bipartisan discussion over the last year. That includes a 14.5% pay increase for junior enlisted troops and increasing access to child care for service members while also providing job support to military spouses.

The measure authorizes a 4.5% across-the-board pay raise for all service members starting Jan. 1. 

The NDAA typically enjoys wide bipartisan support, but this year’s focus on eliminating ‘woke’ policies could be hard for Democrats to stomach.

The policy proposal to prohibit Tricare, the military’s health care provider, from covering transgender services for the minor dependents of service members has raised concerns, prompting the leading Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Adam Smith of Washington, to reconsider his support for the bill.

‘Blanketly denying health care to people who clearly need it, just because of a biased notion against transgender people, is wrong,’ he said in a statement. ‘This provision injected a level of partisanship not traditionally seen in defense bills.’

The goal of that provision is to prevent any ‘medical interventions that could result in sterilization’ of minors.

Other provisions, like a blanket ban on funding for gender transition surgeries for adults, did not make their way into the bill, neither did a ban on requiring masks to prevent the spread of diseases. 

The bill also supports deploying the National Guard to the southern border to help with illegal immigrant apprehensions and drug flow. 

Another provision opens the door to allowing airmen and Space Force personnel to grow facial hair; it directs the secretary of the Air Force to brief lawmakers on ‘the feasibility and advisability’ of establishing a pilot program to test out allowing beards. 

Democrats are also upset the bill did not include a provision expanding access to IVF for service members. Currently, military health care only covers IVF for troops whose infertility is linked to service-related illness or injury.

But the bill did not include an amendment to walk back a provision allowing the Pentagon to reimburse service members who have to travel out of state to get an abortion.

The bill extends a hiring freeze on DEI-related roles and stops all such recruitment until ‘an investigation of the Pentagon’s DEI programs’ can be completed.

It also bans the Defense Department from contracting with advertising companies ‘that blacklist conservative news sources,’ according to an internal GOP memo.

The memo said the NDAA also guts funding for the Biden administration’s ‘Countering Extremist Activity Working Group’ dedicated to rooting out extremism in the military’s ranks. The annual defense policy bill also does not authorize ‘any climate change programs’ and prohibits the Pentagon from issuing climate impact-based guidance on weapons systems.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., touted $31 billion in savings in the legislation that would come from cutting ‘inefficient programs, obsolete weapons, and bloated Pentagon bureaucracy.’

The compromise NDAA bill, negotiated between Republican and Democrat leadership, sets policy for the nation’s largest government agency, but a separate defense spending bill must be passed to allocate funds for such programs.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Conservatives tout victory after stopping last-minute Schumer push to confirm key agency head: ‘Outstanding’
next post
New poll reveals what Americans think of Trump’s transition decisions

Related Posts

Judge tells government watchdogs fired by Trump there’s...

March 28, 2025

Trump slams Merchan, Democrats, who ‘just want to...

January 4, 2025

I was Biden’s man in the room at...

March 21, 2025

Trump urged to review UN immunity, lax visa...

April 4, 2025

Elon Musk outlines ‘super obvious’ changes DOGE and...

February 10, 2025

Trump wants Musk to stay with administration, says...

April 4, 2025

REP. JAMES COMER: Biden family pardons a confession...

January 26, 2025

Pentagon to probe Microsoft’s use of Chinese engineers...

July 19, 2025

Syrian rights activist and cousin of Assad tears...

March 16, 2025

SOUTHCOM commander announces sudden retirement amid Trump drug...

October 17, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Top Iran security official seen in Oman days after indirect nuclear talks with US
  • Kenya demands answers from Russia over recruitment of citizens to fight in Ukraine war
  • Vance: US should get ‘some benefit’ from Greenland if it’s going to be ‘on the hook’ for protecting territory
  • DOJ signals crackdown on synagogue protesters using abortion clinic statute
  • Shutdown clock ticks as Schumer, Democrats dig in on DHS funding demands

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • Top Iran security official seen in Oman days after indirect nuclear talks with US

    February 11, 2026
  • Kenya demands answers from Russia over recruitment of citizens to fight in Ukraine war

    February 11, 2026
  • Vance: US should get ‘some benefit’ from Greenland if it’s going to be ‘on the hook’ for protecting territory

    February 11, 2026
  • DOJ signals crackdown on synagogue protesters using abortion clinic statute

    February 11, 2026
  • Shutdown clock ticks as Schumer, Democrats dig in on DHS funding demands

    February 11, 2026
  • Trump DOJ appointee Thomas Albus tapped to lead Fulton County search warrant fight

    February 11, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 2

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 3

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 7

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (622)
  • Investing (3,014)
  • Politics (3,684)
  • Stocks (1,072)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2026 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved