Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

by admin September 9, 2025
September 9, 2025
Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

President Donald Trump is still facing a $83.3 million payment to writer E. Jean Carroll after a federal appeals court rejected his challenge of a defamation verdict against him Monday.

The ruling from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds a lower court decision finding that Trump did, in fact, defame Carroll. Trump’s lawyers argued his comments about Carroll were protected by presidential immunity and that the verdict in the case was unjust. The three-judge panel rejected both of those claims.

‘We conclude that Trump has failed to identify any grounds that would warrant reconsidering our prior holding on presidential immunity. We also conclude that the district court did not err in any of the challenged rulings and that the jury’s damages awards are fair and reasonable,’ the court opinion read.

‘The record in this case supports the district court’s determination that the ‘the degree of reprehensibility’ of Mr. Trump’s conduct was remarkably high, perhaps unprecedented,’ the court added.

Carroll sued Trump twice after she released a book in 2019, which claimed Trump raped her during a brief encounter with him in a department store dressing room in the 1990s.

Trump vigorously denied the claims, saying he had never met Carroll, that she was not his ‘type’ and that she fabricated the incident to sell books. His vocal and repeated criticisms and denials led to Carroll’s defamation allegations.

Monday’s ruling comes months after the same court rejected Trump’s appeal in another Carroll-related case. In that appeal, Trump challenged evidence that Carroll’s legal team introduced to the jury during the civil lawsuit, including the Access Hollywood tape that surfaced during Trump’s 2016 campaign.

The full panel of judges declined to hear Trump’s argument, however, forcing the president to either accept defeat or appeal to the Supreme Court.

Read the full ruling below (App users click here)

Fox News’ Ashley Oliver contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Thune lays groundwork for nuclear option in Senate fight over Trump nominees
next post
LAPD ends Kamala Harris security after union backlash over elite officer use: report

Related Posts

Trump declares importance of not derailing ‘Syria’s evolution...

December 2, 2025

Former TV anchor heads to same prison as...

November 24, 2025

JONATHAN TURLEY: Judge’s Special Counsel ruling may be...

March 3, 2025

DOGE stimulus checks: Johnson side-steps question on Trump...

February 21, 2025

Trump hits back at reporter who said he’s...

September 4, 2025

Bernie Sanders crashes Schumer news conference, criticizes Democratic...

November 6, 2025

Elon Musk outlines ‘super obvious’ changes DOGE and...

February 10, 2025

Democrats threaten to see Trump team ‘in court’...

October 15, 2025

Pentagon taps Musk’s xAI to boost sensitive government...

December 23, 2025

Trudeau declares himself ‘proud feminist’ after lamenting Harris...

December 13, 2024

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio
  • Trump accuses Tim Walz and Ilhan Omar of using ICE protests to distract from massive state fraud
  • Why Trump zeroed in on Greenland and why it matters in 3 maps
  • Six countries confirm US invitations to Gaza peace board

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    January 19, 2026
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    January 19, 2026
  • Trump accuses Tim Walz and Ilhan Omar of using ICE protests to distract from massive state fraud

    January 19, 2026
  • Why Trump zeroed in on Greenland and why it matters in 3 maps

    January 19, 2026
  • Six countries confirm US invitations to Gaza peace board

    January 19, 2026
  • Nobel Foundation weighs in after Machado presents Peace Prize to Trump

    January 19, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 2

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 3

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 7

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (605)
  • Investing (2,839)
  • Politics (3,477)
  • Stocks (1,034)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2026 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved