Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Blue state AGs accuse Vance of spreading ‘dangerous lie’ following VP’s online criticism of judges

by admin February 15, 2025
February 15, 2025
Blue state AGs accuse Vance of spreading ‘dangerous lie’ following VP’s online criticism of judges

Blue state attorneys general accused Vice President JD Vance of attempting to spread a ‘dangerous lie’ after he criticized judges blocking President Donald Trump’s agenda. 

‘The Vice President’s statement is as wrong as it is reckless. As chief law enforcement officers representing the people of 17 states, we unequivocally reject the Vice President’s attempt to spread this dangerous lie,’ the statement reads. 

Seventeen state attorneys general, including those from California, Connecticut, Arizona, Massachusetts and Washington, signed the statement released Friday after Vance sent the internet into a frenzy, saying, ‘Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.’

‘Americans understand the principle of checks and balances,’ the AGs wrote. ‘The judiciary is a check on unlawful action by the executive and legislative branches of government. Generals, prosecutors, and all public officials are subject to checks and balances. No one is above the law.’ 

Vance’s comments were made after a court blocked the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing personal data. The Trump administration has become the target of more than 50 lawsuits since Trump began his second term in mid-January. Judges in various states across the country, including Washington, Rhode Island and New York, have continuously blocked the administration’s efforts to implement its agenda. 

‘If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal,’ Vance posted on X. ‘If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that’s also illegal. Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.’

The statement from the AGs said that they would ‘carefully scrutinize each and every action taken by this administration.’ They also made clear that if the administration violated the Constitution or federal law, they would ‘not hesitate to act.’

‘Judges granted our motions and issued restraining orders to protect the American people, democracy, and the rule of law. That is and has always been their job,’ the AGs wrote. ‘That job is the very core of our legal system. And in this critical moment, we will stand our ground to defend it.’ 

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi recently pledged her support for Trump’s efforts, vowing to challenge ‘unelected’ judges obstructing his administration’s agenda.

‘We have so many un-elected judges who are trying to control government spending. And there is a clear separation of powers,’ Bondi said during an appearance on ‘America’s Newsroom.’ ‘What they’re doing to [DOGE leader Elon Musk], to our country, is outrageous. You know, people work their whole lives and pay taxes, yet they find out that they’ve been giving $2 million to Guatemala for sex changes. It’s outrageous. And it’s going to stop.’

Since Inauguration Day, dozens of activist and legal groups, elected officials and local jurisdictions, as well as individuals, have launched a myriad of lawsuits in response to the president’s executive orders and directives. Notably, Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, his immigration policies, directives on federal funding, and the implementation of DOGE have all come under fire. 

The Trump administration has proceeded to appeal many of these rulings to the appellate courts. In a recent development, the Trump administration appealed an order from a Rhode Island judge to unfreeze federal funds. The order claimed the administration did not adhere to a previous order to do so. 

The Trump administration appealed the order to the First Circuit shortly thereafter, which was ultimately denied.  

Upon Trump’s historic win in November, Democratic AGs, including New York Attorney General Letitia James, publicly said they would be ready to engage in any legal battles against the Trump administration for actions they view as illegal or negatively impacting residents. 

Fox News Digital’s Emma Colton contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Federal judge delays unions’ request to block DOGE access to agency information
next post
Trump so far has freed 11 hostages in his first month as president; Biden released around 70 in four years

Related Posts

Key GOP senator defects on crucial vote, imperiling...

June 29, 2025

Newsom taunts Trump with series of comments about...

July 17, 2025

Scalise reveals post-shutdown GOP battle plan as House...

November 13, 2025

Labor Secretary Chavez-DeRemer’s first memo calls on staff...

March 13, 2025

CDC official who blasted Trump’s ‘weak science’ led...

August 31, 2025

LIZ PEEK: Democrats rage over Trump’s Iran strikes...

March 3, 2026

Trump pushes to recover ‘billions of dollars’ of...

February 27, 2025

Trump watches strike on Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen...

March 17, 2025

Special Counsel Weiss blasts Biden in final Hunter...

January 14, 2025

DOJ discovers more than 1M potential Epstein records,...

December 25, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Trump’s apocalyptic Iran warning raises stakes for sweeping US strike threat
  • Graham eyes ‘down payment’ on Trump-backed SAVE Act without Democratic support
  • Midterm alarm bells: Democrats face steep favorability deficit despite election gains
  • Democrat whose parents fled Iran moves to oust Hegseth
  • American journalist kidnapped in Iraq is set free, must leave country ‘immediately,’ her employer says

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • Trump’s apocalyptic Iran warning raises stakes for sweeping US strike threat

    April 8, 2026
  • Graham eyes ‘down payment’ on Trump-backed SAVE Act without Democratic support

    April 8, 2026
  • Midterm alarm bells: Democrats face steep favorability deficit despite election gains

    April 8, 2026
  • Democrat whose parents fled Iran moves to oust Hegseth

    April 8, 2026
  • American journalist kidnapped in Iraq is set free, must leave country ‘immediately,’ her employer says

    April 8, 2026
  • What falling wage growth says about where the U.S. economy is heading

    April 8, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 2

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 3

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 7

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (666)
  • Investing (3,251)
  • Politics (4,072)
  • Stocks (1,072)
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2026 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved