Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: Key questions about the Signal psychodrama

by admin March 30, 2025
March 30, 2025
VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: Key questions about the Signal psychodrama
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As we learn the full melodrama of the so-called Signal ‘scandal’ of inviting left-wing, Trump-despising, Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg onto a supposedly secure conference list involving top Trump security officials, lots of questions need asking and answering.

Most importantly, who had Goldberg’s private number and inserted it, ostensibly by mistake, into the cleared list of participants in the discussions? Why would any top Trump officials or their staffers ever even have Goldberg’s contact information, given his quite public record of: a) fabricating stories with unnamed sources, and b) suffering from a decade of chronic Trump derangement syndrome?

Questions for Goldberg: Did he know the mechanisms that had prompted and continued his stealthy presence in the secure discussions? Why did citizen Goldberg not simply come clean as soon as he realized he was mistakenly included in key national security conference communications, to which he did not belong, and thus should be obviously excluded immediately? Why did he instead stealthily listen in for nearly two weeks? Was the idea of informing his hosts of his own improper presence too morally old-fashioned?

Questions for posterity: Did Goldberg’s publicizing these discreet discussions really affect the otherwise completely successful mission to neutralize years of appeased Houthis’ aggression and begin to end their veritable destruction of Red Sea international maritime commerce? How did this blunder rank with prior diplomatic and military screw-ups, like Secretary of State Dean Acheson’s January 1950 Press Club speech de facto excluding South Korea from the American defense umbrella—an omission that may have contributed to the June 1950 North Korean invasion of the South? Was it comparable to Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie’s assurance to Saddam Hussein that, ‘We have no opinion on your Arab-Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait’— which may have prompted his 1990 invasion of Kuwait?

Was it comparable to President Obama’s March 2012 ‘hot mic’ assurance to then-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he would have ‘flexibility’ on American-Eastern European missile defense after his last election? Both kept their promises: Obama foolishly dismantled American-sponsored Eastern European plans for missile defense, and Russia postponed its pre-planned invasion of Ukraine until 2014. 

Did it rank with former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Mark Milley secretly contacting his Chinese communist counterpart, Chinese Gen. Li Zuocheng, to tell him he would give the People’s Liberation Army leader a heads-up if he determined President Donald Trump was likely to trigger an existential war?

And just look who is weighing in. There was Hillary Clinton, despite her illegal use of a private server to transmit classified State Department information and her subsequent destruction of subpoenaed communication devices.

There was serial fabulist Susan Rice, who in 2012 flat-out lied to the nation on five Sunday news shows, claiming preposterously that the terrorist attacks on the American consulate in Benghazi were ‘spontaneous’ demonstrations incited by anger over an anti-Muslim video. Ditto Rice’s fallacious Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl ‘honor’ narrative and her lie about the removal of Syrian weapons of mass destruction.

And why would Leon Panetta weigh in, when he was one of the supposed 51 intelligence authorities in 2020 who ridiculously claimed Hunter Biden’s FBI-authenticated laptop had all the hallmarks of a Russian intelligence disinformation effort? That lie was designed to arm Joe Biden before the last 2020 debate, and it may well have affected the election.

In the end, this was a blunder, but also what the Left likes to call a ‘teachable moment. All future similar conferences should be either held in person or participants must be triple-checked on a secure line. And perhaps most importantly, all Trump high appointees and their staffers should know enough to have nothing to do with those who wake up each morning wishing to destroy them—and go to bed each night lamenting that they have not done enough to advance that destruction.

This column was adapted from Victor Davis Hanson’s post on X.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
How Trump-blocking judges managed to get past Senate judiciary hawks
next post
Trump draws laughs when defining a ‘woman’ — until he touches on a serious issue

Related Posts

Here’s what happened during Trump’s 12th week in...

April 13, 2025

DOGE slashes billions more in expenses for programs...

March 27, 2025

Trump’s pick to lead NIH, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya,...

March 26, 2025

New report warns NATO’s data vulnerabilities could cost...

May 3, 2025

Trump-backed bill to stop ‘rogue’ judges passes House

April 10, 2025

Republicans say they’re ‘out of the loop’ on...

May 15, 2025

SCOOP: Jim Jordan joining Trump at NCAA men’s...

March 22, 2025

Trump, eyeing 3rd term, keeps attacking elite institutions...

April 1, 2025

Howard Lutnick confirmed as Trump’s commerce secretary

February 19, 2025

GOP lawmaker scraps with Democrat in hearing over...

February 6, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Emerging Stocks to Watch – Breakouts, Momentum & Upgrades!
  • S&P 500, Bitcoin & XLK: What the Charts Are Saying Now
  • MACD + ADX: Spot the Pullbacks Worth Trading
  • S&P 500 Slide Explained: What Past Price Action Reveals About Market Dips
  • Republicans look to stop China’s ‘backdoor’ tariff dodging scheme

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • Emerging Stocks to Watch – Breakouts, Momentum & Upgrades!

    May 23, 2025
  • S&P 500, Bitcoin & XLK: What the Charts Are Saying Now

    May 23, 2025
  • MACD + ADX: Spot the Pullbacks Worth Trading

    May 23, 2025
  • S&P 500 Slide Explained: What Past Price Action Reveals About Market Dips

    May 23, 2025
  • Republicans look to stop China’s ‘backdoor’ tariff dodging scheme

    May 23, 2025
  • Trump has not directed admin to declassify Biden docs on health ‘cover-up’

    May 23, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 3

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Trudeau declares himself ‘proud feminist’ after lamenting Harris loss to Trump as setback for women

    December 13, 2024
  • 6

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 7

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (365)
  • Investing (1,182)
  • Politics (1,474)
  • Stocks (478)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved