Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges

by admin December 25, 2024
December 25, 2024
Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges

A top ally of President Biden is ‘disappointed’ after he vetoed a bill that would have increased the number of federal judges currently serving.

Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., who served as a campaign co-chair for both of Biden’s recent presidential campaigns, stressed that he and his Republican colleague Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., kept bipartisanship top of mind when crafting the bill.

‘I am disappointed by this outcome, for my own state and for the federal judges throughout the country struggling under the burden of ever-higher caseloads. I’ve worked on this bill for years, and thanks to tireless bipartisan effort with Senator Young, it made it to the president’s desk. It’s highly unfortunate that it will not become law,’ Coons said in a statement on Tuesday.

He then put the blame on House Republicans for the bill’s ultimate failure, however, for voting on it after the 2024 election.

‘Senator Young and I took pains to make this a nonpartisan process, structuring the JUDGES Act so that Congress could pass the bill before any of us – Republican or Democrat – knew who would occupy the White House in 2025 and therefore nominate the new federal judges,’ Coons said.

‘The Senate did its part by passing the bill unanimously in August; the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, however, waited for election results before moving the bill forward. As a result, the White House is now vetoing this bill.’

Republicans in turn have accused Biden of making threats to veto the bill – which he issued two days before the House voted on it – to avoid giving President-elect Trump new roles to fill.

‘This important legislation garnered broad, bipartisan support when it unanimously passed the Senate in August because it directly addresses the pressing need to reduce case backlogs in our federal courts and strengthen the efficiency of our judicial system,’ Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., pointed out in a statement after the bill passed earlier this month.

 ‘At that time, Democrats supported the bill – they thought Kamala Harris would win the presidency. Now, however, the Biden-Harris administration has chosen to issue a veto threat and Democrats have whipped against this bill, standing in the way of progress, simply because of partisan politics.’

The bill would have added 66 federal district judicial roles, spreading their creation out over more than 10 years to prevent a boon on new appointments for any one administration. 

At the time of its Senate passage, Democrats’ morale was high after Biden ducked out of the 2024 race and was replaced by Vice President Kamala Harris.

It passed the Senate with unanimous consent, however, meaning no Republicans objected to the legislation’s advancement.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
How presidents have spent their Christmases in office: From Hawaii to Mar-a-Lago
next post
AI is reshaping business. This is how we stay ahead of China

Related Posts

Physician governor urges Capitol Hill to block RFK...

January 8, 2025

Mamdani’s rise, ‘vile hatred’ of US Jews the...

July 30, 2025

Hegseth says US to boost ties with Philippines...

March 28, 2025

Nobel laureates criticize RFK Jr. HHS nomination over...

December 11, 2024

‘FOOD BABE’ VANI HARI: Don’t boo the MAHA...

April 6, 2025

Trump says US ‘doing very well’ on Iran...

March 7, 2026

Turkey says Syria using force is an option...

January 16, 2026

New US military GenAI tool ‘critical first step’...

December 24, 2025

Trump’s Venezuela push runs into hard realities for...

January 10, 2026

What James Carville doesn’t get about voter priorities

July 25, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Trump’s apocalyptic Iran warning raises stakes for sweeping US strike threat
  • Graham eyes ‘down payment’ on Trump-backed SAVE Act without Democratic support
  • Midterm alarm bells: Democrats face steep favorability deficit despite election gains
  • Democrat whose parents fled Iran moves to oust Hegseth
  • American journalist kidnapped in Iraq is set free, must leave country ‘immediately,’ her employer says

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • Trump’s apocalyptic Iran warning raises stakes for sweeping US strike threat

    April 8, 2026
  • Graham eyes ‘down payment’ on Trump-backed SAVE Act without Democratic support

    April 8, 2026
  • Midterm alarm bells: Democrats face steep favorability deficit despite election gains

    April 8, 2026
  • Democrat whose parents fled Iran moves to oust Hegseth

    April 8, 2026
  • American journalist kidnapped in Iraq is set free, must leave country ‘immediately,’ her employer says

    April 8, 2026
  • What falling wage growth says about where the U.S. economy is heading

    April 8, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 2

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 3

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 7

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (666)
  • Investing (3,251)
  • Politics (4,072)
  • Stocks (1,072)
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2026 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved