Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges

by admin December 25, 2024
December 25, 2024
Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges

A top ally of President Biden is ‘disappointed’ after he vetoed a bill that would have increased the number of federal judges currently serving.

Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., who served as a campaign co-chair for both of Biden’s recent presidential campaigns, stressed that he and his Republican colleague Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., kept bipartisanship top of mind when crafting the bill.

‘I am disappointed by this outcome, for my own state and for the federal judges throughout the country struggling under the burden of ever-higher caseloads. I’ve worked on this bill for years, and thanks to tireless bipartisan effort with Senator Young, it made it to the president’s desk. It’s highly unfortunate that it will not become law,’ Coons said in a statement on Tuesday.

He then put the blame on House Republicans for the bill’s ultimate failure, however, for voting on it after the 2024 election.

‘Senator Young and I took pains to make this a nonpartisan process, structuring the JUDGES Act so that Congress could pass the bill before any of us – Republican or Democrat – knew who would occupy the White House in 2025 and therefore nominate the new federal judges,’ Coons said.

‘The Senate did its part by passing the bill unanimously in August; the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, however, waited for election results before moving the bill forward. As a result, the White House is now vetoing this bill.’

Republicans in turn have accused Biden of making threats to veto the bill – which he issued two days before the House voted on it – to avoid giving President-elect Trump new roles to fill.

‘This important legislation garnered broad, bipartisan support when it unanimously passed the Senate in August because it directly addresses the pressing need to reduce case backlogs in our federal courts and strengthen the efficiency of our judicial system,’ Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., pointed out in a statement after the bill passed earlier this month.

 ‘At that time, Democrats supported the bill – they thought Kamala Harris would win the presidency. Now, however, the Biden-Harris administration has chosen to issue a veto threat and Democrats have whipped against this bill, standing in the way of progress, simply because of partisan politics.’

The bill would have added 66 federal district judicial roles, spreading their creation out over more than 10 years to prevent a boon on new appointments for any one administration. 

At the time of its Senate passage, Democrats’ morale was high after Biden ducked out of the 2024 race and was replaced by Vice President Kamala Harris.

It passed the Senate with unanimous consent, however, meaning no Republicans objected to the legislation’s advancement.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
How presidents have spent their Christmases in office: From Hawaii to Mar-a-Lago
next post
AI is reshaping business. This is how we stay ahead of China

Related Posts

Federal department cafeteria empty for years under Biden:...

February 21, 2025

Trump names latest Cabinet picks as Jan. 20...

January 10, 2025

Hegseth did not issue ‘kill them all’ order...

December 5, 2025

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to failing to elect a...

December 27, 2024

House GOP campaign chair makes prediction for 2026...

December 19, 2024

Biden, Blinken take credit for groundwork behind Trump’s...

October 14, 2025

PHOTOS: The making of Trump’s White House ballroom,...

October 27, 2025

Snoop Dogg fires back at critics calling him...

May 16, 2025

Cozy ties between top Newsom ally and CCP...

March 13, 2025

What we know about the Trump administration’s plans...

February 4, 2025

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio
  • World Economic Forum boots Iranian foreign minister from Davos summit amid deadly crackdown on protesters
  • White House-backed GOP bill would revoke citizenship after Somali fraud scandal
  • Top GOP senator says Syria ceasefire welcome but actions must match words

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    January 20, 2026
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    January 20, 2026
  • World Economic Forum boots Iranian foreign minister from Davos summit amid deadly crackdown on protesters

    January 20, 2026
  • White House-backed GOP bill would revoke citizenship after Somali fraud scandal

    January 20, 2026
  • Top GOP senator says Syria ceasefire welcome but actions must match words

    January 20, 2026
  • Trump warns US can no longer think ‘purely of peace’ as he pushes for Greenland control

    January 20, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 2

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 3

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 7

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (605)
  • Investing (2,848)
  • Politics (3,487)
  • Stocks (1,036)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2026 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved