Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges

by admin December 25, 2024
December 25, 2024
Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges

A top ally of President Biden is ‘disappointed’ after he vetoed a bill that would have increased the number of federal judges currently serving.

Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., who served as a campaign co-chair for both of Biden’s recent presidential campaigns, stressed that he and his Republican colleague Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., kept bipartisanship top of mind when crafting the bill.

‘I am disappointed by this outcome, for my own state and for the federal judges throughout the country struggling under the burden of ever-higher caseloads. I’ve worked on this bill for years, and thanks to tireless bipartisan effort with Senator Young, it made it to the president’s desk. It’s highly unfortunate that it will not become law,’ Coons said in a statement on Tuesday.

He then put the blame on House Republicans for the bill’s ultimate failure, however, for voting on it after the 2024 election.

‘Senator Young and I took pains to make this a nonpartisan process, structuring the JUDGES Act so that Congress could pass the bill before any of us – Republican or Democrat – knew who would occupy the White House in 2025 and therefore nominate the new federal judges,’ Coons said.

‘The Senate did its part by passing the bill unanimously in August; the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, however, waited for election results before moving the bill forward. As a result, the White House is now vetoing this bill.’

Republicans in turn have accused Biden of making threats to veto the bill – which he issued two days before the House voted on it – to avoid giving President-elect Trump new roles to fill.

‘This important legislation garnered broad, bipartisan support when it unanimously passed the Senate in August because it directly addresses the pressing need to reduce case backlogs in our federal courts and strengthen the efficiency of our judicial system,’ Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., pointed out in a statement after the bill passed earlier this month.

 ‘At that time, Democrats supported the bill – they thought Kamala Harris would win the presidency. Now, however, the Biden-Harris administration has chosen to issue a veto threat and Democrats have whipped against this bill, standing in the way of progress, simply because of partisan politics.’

The bill would have added 66 federal district judicial roles, spreading their creation out over more than 10 years to prevent a boon on new appointments for any one administration. 

At the time of its Senate passage, Democrats’ morale was high after Biden ducked out of the 2024 race and was replaced by Vice President Kamala Harris.

It passed the Senate with unanimous consent, however, meaning no Republicans objected to the legislation’s advancement.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
How presidents have spent their Christmases in office: From Hawaii to Mar-a-Lago
next post
AI is reshaping business. This is how we stay ahead of China

Related Posts

Biden still regrets dropping out of 2024 presidential...

December 29, 2024

‘Instincts for restraint’: Senate divided over who gets...

June 19, 2025

Trump denounces European recognition of Palestinian state as...

September 24, 2025

Trump urges GOP to be ‘flexible’ on Hyde...

January 7, 2026

GOP rising star exposes how Biden admin was...

October 4, 2025

Trump hits back at reporter who said he’s...

September 4, 2025

Grenell developing ‘common sense’ plan to turn Kennedy...

March 15, 2025

Trump gets inaugurated Monday; here’s how the Supreme...

January 20, 2025

Meet the team Trump picked to negotiate ending...

February 18, 2025

Cruz ‘cannot support’ Trump’s Kuwait ambassador pick over...

October 25, 2025

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio
  • China slams Trump administration over US sanctions on Cuba
  • Minnesota fraud case is ‘canary in the coal mine’ for government systems — including elections, lawyer wars
  • House Freedom Caucus draws line on DHS, ICE funding as Minneapolis unrest fuels shutdown risk

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    January 28, 2026
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    January 28, 2026
  • China slams Trump administration over US sanctions on Cuba

    January 28, 2026
  • Minnesota fraud case is ‘canary in the coal mine’ for government systems — including elections, lawyer wars

    January 28, 2026
  • House Freedom Caucus draws line on DHS, ICE funding as Minneapolis unrest fuels shutdown risk

    January 28, 2026
  • Trump says Noem doing ‘very good job, ‘won’t step down as homeland security chief amid Minnesota shift

    January 28, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 2

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 3

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 7

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (607)
  • Investing (2,903)
  • Politics (3,558)
  • Stocks (1,052)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2026 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved