Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

‘Radical Left’ shutdown message ignites firestorm as Democrats push for federal probe

by admin November 18, 2025
November 18, 2025
‘Radical Left’ shutdown message ignites firestorm as Democrats push for federal probe

Senate Democrats are requesting an investigation into what they say is ‘partisan messaging’ that the Trump administration used on official government websites during the longest government shutdown in U.S. history. 

Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Adam Schiff of California and others are urging the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) to launch a probe into whether the Trump administration crossed a line and broke federal laws due to messages posted on official government websites that pinned the blame on Democrats for the shutdown. 

‘Some agencies’ announcements appeared to include nothing more than partisan messaging and lacked a connection to official business,’ lawmakers wrote in a letter, sent to GAO Nov. 9. 

Specifically, the lawmakers pointed to messaging posted on the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s website, which stated on its website during the shutdown: ‘The Radical Left are going to shut down the government and inflict massive pain on the American people unless they get their $1.5 trillion wish list of demands. The Trump administration wants to keep the government open for the American people.’

As a result, the lawmakers questioned whether the statement and others from separate agencies violated federal law, which bars using federal funds for ‘publicity or propaganda purposes.’ 

‘Longstanding federal appropriations law prohibits the executive branch from using federal funds ‘for publicity or propaganda purposes,’ including for purely partisan materials,’ the lawmakers wrote in their letter. ‘Federal law also prohibits agencies from using any appropriated funding, directly or indirectly, to generate publicity designed to influence Congress in supporting or opposing legislation or appropriations.’ 

But Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank, said that Democrats are seeking a distraction from their role in the shutdown.

‘This is an absurd claim and just a publicity stunt by Democrats desperate to push attention away from their failures,’ Spakovsky said in a Friday statement to Fox News Digital. ‘Blaming Democrats for the shutdown was absolutely accurate since they voted more than a dozen times to keep the government shutdown. Truth is an absolute defense to any claim of partisan messaging.’ 

The White House voiced similar sentiments in a statement to Fox News Digital on Monday.

‘It’s an objective fact that Democrats are responsible for the government shutdown, the Trump Administration simply shared the truth with the American people,’ White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement. 

GAO spokesperson Jessica Baxter told Fox News Digital Friday that the organization had received the request and is in the middle of evaluating the request. 

‘I can confirm that GAO has received this congressional request,’ Baxter said. ‘GAO has a process it goes through to determine whether we do work and when, which we are working through right now.’

Other lawmakers who signed the letter include Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, Ron Wyden of Oregon, among others. 

Trump signed a bill Wednesday to fund the government again as consequences of the lapse in funding started to build — including missed paychecks for federal workers and airline delays due to air traffic controller staffing shortages.

The bill keeps funding for the government at fiscal year 2025 spending levels through Jan. 30 to provide lawmakers an opportunity to secure a longer appropriations measure for fiscal year 2026.

The shutdown originated due to Republicans and Democrats sparring over various healthcare provisions to include in a potential funding measure. Trump and Republicans claimed Democrats wanted to provide illegal immigrants healthcare, and pointed to a provision that would repeal part of Trump’s tax and domestic policy bill known as the ‘big, beautiful bill’ that reduced Medicaid eligibility for non-U.S. citizens.

But Democrats said this wasn’t the case, and instead, said they want to permanently extend certain Affordable Care Act subsidies that are set to expire at the end of 2025.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Raspy-voiced Trump reveals reason he ‘blew my stack’ in heated discussion
next post
Cruz keeps 2028 door open as speculation grows over GOP’s post-Trump future

Related Posts

Mayor Eric Adams endorses Andrew Cuomo as his...

October 24, 2025

Bondi, Trump Cabinet convenes task force to root...

April 23, 2025

Greenland government calls Trump’s acquisition talks ‘unacceptable’

March 16, 2025

Netanyahu gifts Fetterman a silver-plated beeper after he...

March 20, 2025

Privatize the TSA: 3 steps to better service...

March 27, 2025

Elon Musk strategizes $1 trillion spending cuts with...

March 6, 2025

Trump administration defends US and Israeli sovereignty with...

June 6, 2025

Jackson’s scathing dissent levels partisan charge at colleagues...

August 23, 2025

Judge restricts DOGE access to federal databases, finding...

June 11, 2025

Zelenskyy not invited to upcoming Trump, Putin talks...

August 13, 2025

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio
  • House Republicans say Dems twisting Epstein probe to smear Trump in new memo
  • War Department refocuses on AI, hypersonics and directed energy in major strategy overhaul
  • China’s energy siege of Taiwan could cripple US supply chains, report warns

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    November 18, 2025
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    November 18, 2025
  • House Republicans say Dems twisting Epstein probe to smear Trump in new memo

    November 18, 2025
  • War Department refocuses on AI, hypersonics and directed energy in major strategy overhaul

    November 18, 2025
  • China’s energy siege of Taiwan could cripple US supply chains, report warns

    November 18, 2025
  • Epstein referenced Trump in private emails to Ghislaine Maxwell and others, new records show

    November 18, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 3

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 4

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 7

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (590)
  • Investing (2,440)
  • Politics (2,980)
  • Stocks (910)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved