Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Investing

Québec Communities Vote “No” to La Loutre Graphite Mine

by admin September 6, 2025
September 6, 2025
Québec Communities Vote “No” to La Loutre Graphite Mine

Residents in five Western Québec municipalities of have overwhelmingly rejected a proposed open-pit graphite mine, with 95 percent voting against the La Loutre project in a referendum.

Nearly 3,000 ballots were cast on Sunday (August 31) across Duhamel, Lac-des-Plages, Lac-Simon, Chénéville and Saint-Émile-de-Suffolk. Of those, 2,754 citizens voted against the asset, while only 115 were in favor.

The organizers say the result leaves no room for ambiguity about local opposition.

Located near Lac Bélanger, roughly 80 kilometers northeast of Gatineau, La Loutre is owned by Lomiko Metals (TSXV:LMR,OTCQB:LMRMF), which says it is a potential source of graphite for electric vehicle batteries.

China is the world’s largest producer of graphite by far, and countries around the world are looking to lock down supply of the material. In 2024, Lomiko received a US$8.35 million grant from the US Department of Defense, as well as C$4.9 million from Natural Resources Canada, as the countries looked to strengthen North America’s supply chain.

But for many locals, the referendum on La Loutre was not about global supply chains, but about protecting the lakes, forests and tourism-driven economy that sustain the Petite-Nation region.

Duhamel Mayor David Pharand, long opposed to the mine, said the scale of the rejection will shape what comes next.

“I can assure the population that the percentage of the results of this referendum will have a major impact on the decision of the government and the action that will be taken,” Pharand told CBC. “We will work based on those numbers with our political, federal, and provincial members of parliament to see that this project is not funded.”

Provincial officials struck a similar tone. Papineau MRC prefect Paul-André David said in a statement that the results reflect widespread environmental concerns and will guide the region’s stance in discussions with Québec City:

“The MRC will have to take the necessary measures to protect the interests of the community, by demanding that governments ensure that the sustainable management of water, air and landscapes is at the heart of discussions.’

Mathieu Lacombe, the Coalition Avenir Québec member of Québec’s National Assembly for Papineau, called the outcome “unequivocal” and pledged in a Facebook post to “ensure that the will of citizens is respected.”

Premier François Legault has repeatedly said in recent years that “if there is no social acceptability, there will be no mining activity,” a promise the Coalition du NON is now urging him to uphold.

Coalition presses for government action

The referendum was organized with support from the Alliance des municipalités Petite-Nation Nord and spearheaded by local business and land-use groups under the banner of the Coalition du NON.

The coalition is demanding that both provincial and federal governments move quickly to halt the project and declare the territory incompatible with mining activity. Louis St-Hilaire, president of the Petite-Nation Lake Protection Group and co-spokesperson for the coalition, said the result represents a clear directive.

“Through this referendum, citizens have shown that mining is clearly not what they want for their region and that they will continue to oppose it. Mr. Legault, the public is now asking you, in the public interest, to revoke Lomiko Metals’ mining rights in this area,” St-Hilaire said.

Lomiko acknowledges challenge of social license

Lomiko received permits from the Québec government to begin a 250 metric ton bulk sample at La Loutre on July 1, also saying in the update that it was in a permitting phase to start geotechnical site investigations.

In a statement to CBC on Tuesday (September 2), the company acknowledged the referendum outcome, while stressing that “the many outstanding questions will become clearer as it carries out additional studies.”

Last year, Lomiko expressed disappointment after Québec’s government declined to fund the project, saying the province appeared to be drawing “pre-emptive conclusions” before technical assessments were completed.

Local leaders say the onus is now squarely on provincial and federal authorities to respect the verdict.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

previous post
Editor’s Picks: Gold Sets New Price Record, Silver Hits 14 Year High
next post
Purepoint Uranium Closes Final Tranche of $6 Million Private Placement

Related Posts

Radisson Awarded UL ECOLOGO Certification for Responsible Mineral...

March 5, 2025

Don Durrett: Gold, Silver Price Targets and 15...

February 8, 2025

FireFly Metals Gets Approval to Dual List on...

December 14, 2024

6 Mining Companies Make Top 20 on 2025...

January 18, 2025

Investing in Uranium ETFs: 9 Options for Uranium...

May 10, 2025

Acquisition Legal DD Complete

July 2, 2025

Gold Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect...

December 12, 2024

CoTec Holdings Corp. Notes HyProMag USA Press Release...

September 5, 2025

Heritage Mining Announces Exploration Permit for Contact Bay...

December 11, 2024

Results of General Meeting, Admission of Retail Offer...

March 25, 2025

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio
  • MIKE DAVIS: Impeachment time for Trump-hating renegade Judge Boasberg
  • Trump caps week with bold military moves from Pentagon name change to cartel crackdown
  • Top Biden officials questioned and criticized how his team issued pardons, used autopen: report

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    September 7, 2025
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    September 7, 2025
  • MIKE DAVIS: Impeachment time for Trump-hating renegade Judge Boasberg

    September 7, 2025
  • Trump caps week with bold military moves from Pentagon name change to cartel crackdown

    September 7, 2025
  • Top Biden officials questioned and criticized how his team issued pardons, used autopen: report

    September 7, 2025
  • DAVID MARCUS: The Department of War marks the end of America as the world’s policeman

    September 7, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 3

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 4

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 5

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 6

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 7

    Trudeau declares himself ‘proud feminist’ after lamenting Harris loss to Trump as setback for women

    December 13, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (539)
  • Investing (1,927)
  • Politics (2,349)
  • Stocks (766)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved