Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Investing

Québec Communities Vote “No” to La Loutre Graphite Mine

by admin September 6, 2025
September 6, 2025
Québec Communities Vote “No” to La Loutre Graphite Mine

Residents in five Western Québec municipalities of have overwhelmingly rejected a proposed open-pit graphite mine, with 95 percent voting against the La Loutre project in a referendum.

Nearly 3,000 ballots were cast on Sunday (August 31) across Duhamel, Lac-des-Plages, Lac-Simon, Chénéville and Saint-Émile-de-Suffolk. Of those, 2,754 citizens voted against the asset, while only 115 were in favor.

The organizers say the result leaves no room for ambiguity about local opposition.

Located near Lac Bélanger, roughly 80 kilometers northeast of Gatineau, La Loutre is owned by Lomiko Metals (TSXV:LMR,OTCQB:LMRMF), which says it is a potential source of graphite for electric vehicle batteries.

China is the world’s largest producer of graphite by far, and countries around the world are looking to lock down supply of the material. In 2024, Lomiko received a US$8.35 million grant from the US Department of Defense, as well as C$4.9 million from Natural Resources Canada, as the countries looked to strengthen North America’s supply chain.

But for many locals, the referendum on La Loutre was not about global supply chains, but about protecting the lakes, forests and tourism-driven economy that sustain the Petite-Nation region.

Duhamel Mayor David Pharand, long opposed to the mine, said the scale of the rejection will shape what comes next.

“I can assure the population that the percentage of the results of this referendum will have a major impact on the decision of the government and the action that will be taken,” Pharand told CBC. “We will work based on those numbers with our political, federal, and provincial members of parliament to see that this project is not funded.”

Provincial officials struck a similar tone. Papineau MRC prefect Paul-André David said in a statement that the results reflect widespread environmental concerns and will guide the region’s stance in discussions with Québec City:

“The MRC will have to take the necessary measures to protect the interests of the community, by demanding that governments ensure that the sustainable management of water, air and landscapes is at the heart of discussions.’

Mathieu Lacombe, the Coalition Avenir Québec member of Québec’s National Assembly for Papineau, called the outcome “unequivocal” and pledged in a Facebook post to “ensure that the will of citizens is respected.”

Premier François Legault has repeatedly said in recent years that “if there is no social acceptability, there will be no mining activity,” a promise the Coalition du NON is now urging him to uphold.

Coalition presses for government action

The referendum was organized with support from the Alliance des municipalités Petite-Nation Nord and spearheaded by local business and land-use groups under the banner of the Coalition du NON.

The coalition is demanding that both provincial and federal governments move quickly to halt the project and declare the territory incompatible with mining activity. Louis St-Hilaire, president of the Petite-Nation Lake Protection Group and co-spokesperson for the coalition, said the result represents a clear directive.

“Through this referendum, citizens have shown that mining is clearly not what they want for their region and that they will continue to oppose it. Mr. Legault, the public is now asking you, in the public interest, to revoke Lomiko Metals’ mining rights in this area,” St-Hilaire said.

Lomiko acknowledges challenge of social license

Lomiko received permits from the Québec government to begin a 250 metric ton bulk sample at La Loutre on July 1, also saying in the update that it was in a permitting phase to start geotechnical site investigations.

In a statement to CBC on Tuesday (September 2), the company acknowledged the referendum outcome, while stressing that “the many outstanding questions will become clearer as it carries out additional studies.”

Last year, Lomiko expressed disappointment after Québec’s government declined to fund the project, saying the province appeared to be drawing “pre-emptive conclusions” before technical assessments were completed.

Local leaders say the onus is now squarely on provincial and federal authorities to respect the verdict.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

previous post
Top 5 Canadian Mining Stocks This Week: Carlton Precious Gains 78 Percent
next post
Purepoint Uranium Closes Final Tranche of $6 Million Private Placement

Related Posts

BPH Energy

November 12, 2025

CHARBONE annonce un financement de reglements de dettes...

October 18, 2025

Alvopetro Energy

February 6, 2025

SCRi Announces Seventh Consecutive Quarter of Revenue Growth...

March 26, 2025

Graphite Processing Expansion Opportunities

June 19, 2025

Syntheia Signs Maiden Enterprise Deal with Van-Fort Ontario

February 21, 2025

Crypto Market Recap: Bitcoin in Bear Market, SEC-Ripple...

April 17, 2025

Skyharbour Announces Participation in Red Cloud’s 2025 Fall...

November 1, 2025

Crypto Market Update: FalconX to Buy 21Shares, Senate...

October 23, 2025

Purepoint Completes Initial Drill Program Along Groomes Lake...

May 23, 2025

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio
  • White House official presses allies to free AI from innovation-killing regulations
  • Kamala Harris declares herself a ‘historic’ figure: ‘There will be a marble bust of me’
  • GOP senator pitches ‘Black Friday’ Obamacare fix that bridges Democrat, Republican demands

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    December 10, 2025
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    December 10, 2025
  • White House official presses allies to free AI from innovation-killing regulations

    December 10, 2025
  • Kamala Harris declares herself a ‘historic’ figure: ‘There will be a marble bust of me’

    December 10, 2025
  • GOP senator pitches ‘Black Friday’ Obamacare fix that bridges Democrat, Republican demands

    December 10, 2025
  • Bipartisan lawmakers unveil Obamacare extension as pressure grows on Johnson for play call

    December 10, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 3

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 4

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 7

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (602)
  • Investing (2,600)
  • Politics (3,146)
  • Stocks (954)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved