Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Business

Jerome Powell asks inspector general to review Fed’s $2.5B renovation project

by admin July 16, 2025
July 16, 2025
Jerome Powell asks inspector general to review Fed’s $2.5B renovation project

The Federal Reserve has brought in its inspector general to review a building expansion that has drawn fire from the White House, according to a source familiar with the issue.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell asked for the review, following blistering criticism of the project, initially pegged at $2.5 billion but hit by cost overruns that have brought accusations from President Donald Trump and other administration officials of “fundamental mismanagement.”

“The idea that the Fed could print money and then spend $2.5 billion on a building without real congressional oversight, it didn’t occur to the people that framed the Federal Reserve Act,” Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said Monday on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “We’ve got a real problem of oversight and excess spending.”

The inspector general serves the Fed and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and is responsible for looking for fraud, waste and abuse. Powell’s request was reported first by Axios.

In a letter posted to social media last week, Russell Vought, head of the Office of Management and Budget, also slammed the project, which involves two of the Fed’s three Washington, D.C., buildings including its main headquarters known as the Eccles Building.

Vought, during a CNBC interview Friday, likened the building to the Palace of Versailles in France and charged that Powell was guilty of “fiscal mismanagement” at the Fed.

For its part, the central bank has posted a detailed frequently asked questions page on its site, highlighting key details and explaining why some of the specifications were changed or “scaled back or eliminated” at least in part due to higher-than-expected construction costs.

“The project also remediates safety issues by removing hazardous materials such as asbestos and lead and will bring the buildings up to modern code,” the page explains. “While periodic work has been done to keep the buildings occupiable, neither building has seen a comprehensive renovation since they were constructed.”

The Fed is not a taxpayer-funded institution and is therefore not under the OMB’s supervision. It has worked with the National Capital Planning Commission in Washington on the project, but also noted on the FAQ page that it “does not regard any of those changes as warranting further review.”

In separate comments, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh, speaking Sunday on Fox News, called the renovation costs “outrageous” and said it was more evidence the central bank “has lost its way.” Warsh is considered a strong contender to succeed Powell when the latter’s term as chair expires in May 2026.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

previous post
What Happens Next for the S&P 500? Pick Your Path!
next post
Rule Symposium 2025: Gold, Geopolitics and the Real Asset Uprising

Related Posts

Starbucks union announces strike to last through Christmas...

December 21, 2024

Biden administration seeks to avoid default crisis for...

January 17, 2025

Trump made millions on guitars, Bibles and watches...

June 17, 2025

Kraft Heinz to remove artificial dyes from U.S....

June 18, 2025

Chipotle downplays looming Trump tariffs, says only half...

February 7, 2025

Streaming overtakes cable and broadcast as the most-watched...

June 19, 2025

Oil executives bluntly criticize Trump tariffs and ‘drill,...

March 28, 2025

Hertz says 2024 hack exposed some customers’ driver...

April 16, 2025

Procter & Gamble to cut 7,000 jobs as...

June 10, 2025

Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in...

December 31, 2024

Recent Posts

  • RGTI Stock Surged 30% — Is This the Start of a Quantum Comeback?
  • Three Bearish Candle Patterns Every Investor Should Know
  • These HOT Industry Groups are Fueling This Secular Bull Market
  • ‘Irrelevant’: Senators push back against Vought’s call for more partisan spending process
  • Biden-era policy indirectly paying for unaccompanied minors’ abortions rescinded by Trump DOJ

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • RGTI Stock Surged 30% — Is This the Start of a Quantum Comeback?

    July 18, 2025
  • Three Bearish Candle Patterns Every Investor Should Know

    July 18, 2025
  • These HOT Industry Groups are Fueling This Secular Bull Market

    July 18, 2025
  • ‘Irrelevant’: Senators push back against Vought’s call for more partisan spending process

    July 18, 2025
  • Biden-era policy indirectly paying for unaccompanied minors’ abortions rescinded by Trump DOJ

    July 18, 2025
  • Unearthed chat sheds light on cozy ties between judges, climate activists, raising ethical concerns

    July 18, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 3

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 4

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 5

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 6

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 7

    Trudeau declares himself ‘proud feminist’ after lamenting Harris loss to Trump as setback for women

    December 13, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (455)
  • Investing (1,586)
  • Politics (1,957)
  • Stocks (662)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved