Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

In a SNAP, Trump blamed for blocking food assistance to low-income families

by admin November 10, 2025
November 10, 2025
In a SNAP, Trump blamed for blocking food assistance to low-income families

Let’s put politics aside, as if that were possible, and look at how the craziness of the last few days is affecting people.

A week ago, President Donald Trump announced that the 42 million Americans on the SNAP nutrition program would not be getting their benefits — this against the backdrop of a government shutdown that has now reached its 40th day.

This against the backdrop of millions of federal workers who have not been paid while the shutdown drags on — and many of whom live paycheck to paycheck.

This against the backdrop of Trump throwing a lavish, Great Gatsby-themed Mar-a-Lago bash where guests in formal wear watched opera and feasted on blue cheese mousse, sliced beef filet, seared scallops and Trump chocolate cake.

Meanwhile, a federal judge ordered the administration to resume SNAP benefits, which cost $8.5 billion a month, but the Supreme Court gave Trump time to appeal.

And when at least nine states said they would pay for SNAP benefits during the crisis, Trump ordered them to ‘immediately undo’ any effort to provide food stamps to lower-income families — or face financial penalties.

Let’s see: how does this make the president look?

I hate this word, but what are the optics of this determined effort to stop these benefits from reaching hungry families?

After all, when a wealthy donor pal, Timothy Mellon, a banking and railroad heir, offered $130 million to ensure that American troops get paid during the shutdown, Trump seized the opportunity.

After all, the Trump tax cut was tilted toward the wealthy.

After all, Trump has further cut capital gains taxes on home sales that will mostly benefit the affluent and wealthy, enabling many to pay zero, or a reduced rate, on these sales. If you are totally unaware of this, you probably don’t qualify.

After all — this may have been the weirdest thing — Trump said Obamacare is so terrible that he wants to send people $2,000 checks so they can buy their own insurance.

But, where would they buy it, if not from an insurance company? And what would they do if the stock market plunged? There’s a reason that privatization of health insurance has never gone anywhere.

So to come back to politics (inevitably), how does any of this help Trump?

I get the notion that he’s trying to boost the pain level so that Democrats will end the shutdown on his terms.

The Democrats, who have made soaring Obamacare premiums a central part of their pitch — and fear millions will lose coverage unless expiring subsidies are extended — have hung on longer than anyone expected.

For what it’s worth, both sides deserve a ton of blame for failing to keep the lights on during this endless blame game, rather than work out a compromise, which is what we pay them to do.

But don’t Trump and JD Vance, who called the judge’s order ‘absurd,’ look like they don’t particularly care if millions of families go hungry, or are taking food from dumpsters?

Seriously, is there an alternative explanation?

Blaming the other side is fine for the usual political fun and games. But doing it during this kind of self-inflicted crisis?

With the opposition throwing out charges of cruelty, is there some nine — dimensional chess level on which this helps Trump?

Trump says former President Joe Biden ‘went totally crazy’ and handed out food stamps to ‘anybody that would ask.’ So is this liberalism gone wild? I decided to do a little digging.

Turns out there are income limits, and those in the program must meet work requirements. What’s more, the oft-repeated charge that illegal immigrants are getting SNAP benefits is simply untrue, though there are exemptions for children and refugees. (Obviously, you can never completely rule out instances of fraud.)

During the pandemic, when unemployment soared, Congress passed an emergency measure that temporarily suspended a work requirement for adults without dependents who were capable of holding jobs. This happened under … President Trump, in his first term, in 2020.

Under a deal with Republicans in 2023, work requirements for SNAP were increased. That happened under … Biden. Some Republicans, meanwhile, said the measure didn’t go far enough.

By the way, SNAP participation peaked in the fall of 2017, under Trump, which was related to hurricane emergencies.

Sorry for the green-eyeshade stuff, but I thought it was worth more research.

Most people don’t have the time or interest in excavating the details. They just know they aren’t getting the food aid they expected and that neither are millions of other lower-income families. And especially with his dogged determination to block the states from helping out, many are holding Trump accountable.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Locksley Resources LimitedLiDAR Survey at Antimony Mine Advances U.S. Production Plans
next post
Trump pardons Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, others involved in 2020 election interference saga

Related Posts

10 rising stars in Democrat, Republican parties expected...

December 31, 2024

DAN GAINOR: The 5 craziest stories of October...

November 2, 2025

UNRWA officials lobby congressional staffers against Trump terrorist...

January 17, 2026

Here’s what happened during President Donald Trump’s 5th...

February 22, 2025

State Department unveils patriotic ‘America First’ rebrand as...

July 3, 2025

A kinder, gentler Trump? President-elect taking a more...

December 11, 2024

Senate advances Trump’s pick to lead the US...

January 30, 2025

40 Days for Life sees spike in volunteers...

October 19, 2025

US and Qatar secure release of American citizen...

September 29, 2025

Biden says he is still considering pre-emptive pardons...

January 9, 2025

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio
  • NATO ambassador says Europe ‘has a tendency to overreact’ over Greenland dispute
  • Khamenei calls Trump a ‘criminal,’ blames him for deadly protests sweeping Iran
  • Democrat insider rips Mamdani bidet hopes for Gracie Mansion, cites Trump White House bathroom reno hypocrisy

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    January 18, 2026
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    January 18, 2026
  • NATO ambassador says Europe ‘has a tendency to overreact’ over Greenland dispute

    January 18, 2026
  • Khamenei calls Trump a ‘criminal,’ blames him for deadly protests sweeping Iran

    January 18, 2026
  • Democrat insider rips Mamdani bidet hopes for Gracie Mansion, cites Trump White House bathroom reno hypocrisy

    January 18, 2026
  • Former Iranian prisoners reveal torture horrors as regime kills protesters on sight during crackdown

    January 18, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 2

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 3

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 7

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (605)
  • Investing (2,837)
  • Politics (3,470)
  • Stocks (1,032)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2026 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved