Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

DAVID MARCUS: Sorry Dems, literally nobody believes married women can’t get IDs

by admin April 13, 2025
April 13, 2025
DAVID MARCUS: Sorry Dems, literally nobody believes married women can’t get IDs
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The latest ridiculous lie from Democrats about how Republicans are driving the country towards fascism is out, and it is a doozy. This time, we are meant to believe that Trump and the GOP are banning married women from voting.

Spoiler Alert: They aren’t.

Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., and others took to video this week to make the nonsensical and logically tortured claim, saying, ‘House Republicans’ so-called ‘SAVE Act’ blocks nearly 70 million women from registering to vote—just because they changed their name after marriage.’

Here is what failed glass-ceiling breaker Hillary Clinton had to say: ‘The House just passed the Republican voter suppression measure that threatens voting access for millions of Americans, including 69 million women whose married names don’t match their birth certificates.’

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act requires prrof of citizenship to cast a vote in federal elections. Among the acceptable documents for demonstrating proof of citizenship are: A REAL ID-compliant driver’s license, a valid U.S. passport, and a military ID.

You would think the driver’s license requirement would be simple enough, but then again, blue-state Democrats screwed that up when they insisted on giving driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants whose supporting documents could not be verified. Now, the rest of us have to get extra verification for our driver’s licenses so they can be distinguished from the ones handed out like candy to illegal aliens.

So now, Democrats are seriously suggesting that married women in our country are all but incapable of obtaining verified identification and therefore will be disenfranchised by Republicans, presumably while they twist their handlebar mustaches and kick some puppies.

I’d like to ask Rep. Swalwell, if married women are incapable of getting IDs such as a driver’s license, then why is there an almost endless line of them in cars in front of me at the school pick-up line?

Furthermore, I am given to understand that married women quite regularly travel abroad. If they can’t get a passport, then how is this happening? Are their husbands bribing border officials?

… there are approximately 70 million married women in the United States who may have taken their spouse’s last name, which means there are 70 million Americans who know damn well how easily they can obtain valid ID.

If, in fact, there is some intractable issue preventing married women from getting ID, then we should fix it. But given that nobody had ever heard of this ‘major problem’ until Republicans brought up a voter ID law, it is, well, suspicious.

This is especially true, given that up to 80% of Americans support showing valid ID to vote, yet instead of honoring the will of the people, the left, once again, goes charging towards facile identity politics.

You have to hand it to the Democrats. When they latch onto a message, they immediately start yelling it in unison with all the subtlety of a sky-writing competition, like last month, when they all started cursing like Andrew Dice Clay one day.

As cosmically stupid and demonstrably false as it is, this claim that married women will be disparately impacted, or uniquely disadvantaged by the voter ID law is par for a very dangerous course that the Democrats run over and over.

According to the Democrats, we can’t have safer streets because minorities or the poor will be arrested more often, we can’t protect women in sports because that violates trans rights and now we can’t secure the vote because married women don’t know how to get IDs.

This is all ‘disparate impact ad absurdum.’ if there is one non-white, non-straight, non-cis person in America who faces a negative consequence from legislation, then the whole thing has to be tanked. 

Meanwhile, Democrats push policies like student debt relief that clearly disadvantages Americans who never went to college, but in this case somehow the discrimination is enlightened.

The final nail in the coffin of this insane notion that the GOP wants to disenfranchise everyone with ‘Mrs.’ in front of her name, or in Democrats opinion, his or her name, is that married women lean Republican in their voting.

In fact, recent polling has shown that with full voter participation, the Republicans and Trump would have won by even more in 2024, so why on earth would the GOP want to leave those votes on the table?

Ultimately, what the Democrats have here is a reality problem. As Swalwell pointed out, there are approximately 70 million married women in the United States who may have taken their spouse’s last name, which means there are 70 million Americans who know damn well how easily they can obtain valid ID.

So get out there and vote, married ladies. There is literally nothing stopping you.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Here’s what happened during Trump’s 12th week in office
next post
New US Tariffs and Intensifying US–China Trade War: Economic Implications and Opportunities for India

Related Posts

Trump’s fourth week in office could include meeting...

February 10, 2025

Trump set to meet with world leaders in...

February 24, 2025

‘America first’ vs. ‘America last’: What does Trump’s...

December 20, 2024

UAE AMBASSADOR YOUSEF AL OTAIBA: US and UAE...

June 4, 2025

Trump diplomats to Turkey, UK confirmed as Houston...

April 30, 2025

New poll details Americans’ views on Trump and...

March 14, 2025

White House reveals possible penalties on Putin amid...

April 29, 2025

Democrat Rep Jared Golden says his party’s moving...

April 5, 2025

Trump’s ‘STOP’ message to Putin echoes Biden’s ‘don’t’...

April 26, 2025

Former Clinton aide Huma Abedin, Alex Soros marry...

June 16, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Three Stocks in Focus: One Old Favorite, One Mag Name, and a Dow Comeback Story
  • July Strength, Late-Summer Caution: 3 Charts to Watch
  • State Department says 59,000 tons of food assistance are in motion after reports of incinerated aid
  • Pentagon to probe Microsoft’s use of Chinese engineers on sensitive defense systems, Hegseth says
  • Patel touts FBI’s dozens of convictions in $250 million Minnesota COVID scam

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • Three Stocks in Focus: One Old Favorite, One Mag Name, and a Dow Comeback Story

    July 19, 2025
  • July Strength, Late-Summer Caution: 3 Charts to Watch

    July 19, 2025
  • State Department says 59,000 tons of food assistance are in motion after reports of incinerated aid

    July 19, 2025
  • Pentagon to probe Microsoft’s use of Chinese engineers on sensitive defense systems, Hegseth says

    July 19, 2025
  • Patel touts FBI’s dozens of convictions in $250 million Minnesota COVID scam

    July 19, 2025
  • EPA announces 23% workforce reduction and closure of research office as part of federal streamlining

    July 19, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 3

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 4

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 5

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 6

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 7

    Trudeau declares himself ‘proud feminist’ after lamenting Harris loss to Trump as setback for women

    December 13, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (457)
  • Investing (1,595)
  • Politics (1,967)
  • Stocks (664)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved