Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Biden’s vax-focused COVID-19 website obliterated by White House, replaced with ‘true origins’ virus guide

by admin April 19, 2025
April 19, 2025
Biden’s vax-focused COVID-19 website obliterated by White House, replaced with ‘true origins’ virus guide

The Trump administration rolled out a revamped COVID.gov website Friday showing the ‘true origins’ of the coronavirus, while admonishing Democrats and the media for discrediting the theory the virus leaked from a lab and alternative health treatments, and for imposing strict mandates. 

‘This administration prioritizes transparency over all else,’ a senior administration official told Fox News Digital Friday. ‘The American people deserve to know the truth about the Covid pandemic and we will always find ways to reach communities with that message.’ 

The website, which previously had focused on promoting the coronavirus vaccine to Americans, now walks readers through evidence supporting the lab leak theory, how former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci promoted the idea that COVID-19 originated naturally, former President Joe Biden pardoning Fauci for ‘any offenses against’ the U.S. he may have committed, and providing details on the origin of the ‘social distancing’ rules and mask mandates. 

”The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2′ publication — which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory — was promoted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated naturally,’ the site states, before launching into five bullet points on the origins of the virus. 

The new site outlines that a biological characteristic found in the virus was not found in nature, bolstering the lab leak theory, while noting that Wuhan, China, where the first coronavirus case was found, is also home to China’s ‘foremost SARs research lab’ and that ‘if there was evidence of a natural origin it would have already surfaced. But it hasn’t.’

The Trump administration’s CIA reported earlier in 2025 that a lab leak was the likely origin of the COVID-19 virus, which had been passed off by media outlets and scientists as a likely conspiracy theory during the early days of the pandemic. The Department of Energy under the Biden administration and former FBI Director Christopher Wray in 2023 also said evidence indicated the coronarius was the result of a lab leak. 

The website also walks readers through the origins of COVID-era rules, such as mask mandates and social distancing. 

‘The ‘6 feet apart’ social distancing recommendation — which shut down schools and small business across the country — was arbitrary and not based on science,’ it states. ‘During closed door testimony, Dr. Fauci testified that guidance ‘sort of just appeared.’ 

The website says of mask mandates: ‘There was no conclusive evidence that masks effectively protected Americans from COVID-19. Public health officials flip-flopped on the efficacy of masks without providing Americans scientific data — causing a massive uptick in public distrust.’ 

The website notes that content on the page was sourced directly from the House Oversight Committee’s Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. 

‘Public health officials often mislead the American people through conflicting messaging, knee-jerk reactions, and a lack of transparency,’ the website states under a portion called ‘COVID-19 misinformation.’ ‘Most egregiously, the federal government demonized alternative treatments and disfavored narratives, such as the lab leak theory, in a shameful effort to coerce and control the American people’s health decisions.’ 

Many media outlets dismissed Trump in 2020 when he said he had seen evidence that the virus originated in a Wuhan, China, lab, before U.S. intelligence officials such as Wray and the Department of Energy reported that the virus likely originated there. 

Many outlets have since published articles showing the theory is credible, including the New York Times running a March column claiming the scientific community ‘badly misled’ the public in an effort to suppress theory, even after the paper’s own science writer called the theory ‘racist.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Trump says US will ‘take a pass’ on Ukraine peace efforts if Russia refuses to play ball
next post
Top GOP senator calls out Code Pink, The People’s Forum allegedly pushing CCP propaganda in US

Related Posts

Dems who lashed out at Trump for being...

February 7, 2025

Booker delivering marathon Senate speech against Trump admin,...

April 1, 2025

Trump praised for getting NATO allies to bolster...

March 14, 2025

State Department issues worldwide caution for US travelers...

June 23, 2025

‘Ultra-right’: Trump budget chief pick Russell Vought faces...

January 23, 2025

Trump strikes back with retaliatory measures against Colombia...

January 27, 2025

Trump’s big achievement in bombing Iran, still slammed...

June 25, 2025

House advances Trump’s massive agenda bill after fiscal...

July 3, 2025

Trump urges House Republicans to ignore ‘grandstanders’ and...

July 2, 2025

Who is Giorgia Meloni? Trump hosts Italian PM...

January 6, 2025

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics
  • The Best Five Sectors, #28
  • What Musk’s fracture with Trump means for GOP’s future: ‘Beating heart of the Republican Party’
  • Trump’s housing chief rips Powell for blowing millions on Fed facelift during housing crisis he perpetuates
  • Trump celebrates 6 months back in office: US ‘totally revived’ after being ‘DEAD’ under Biden

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    July 21, 2025
  • The Best Five Sectors, #28

    July 21, 2025
  • What Musk’s fracture with Trump means for GOP’s future: ‘Beating heart of the Republican Party’

    July 21, 2025
  • Trump’s housing chief rips Powell for blowing millions on Fed facelift during housing crisis he perpetuates

    July 21, 2025
  • Trump celebrates 6 months back in office: US ‘totally revived’ after being ‘DEAD’ under Biden

    July 21, 2025
  • Biden admin spent hefty sum of US tax dollars to upgrade embassy swimming pools in Iraq, Russia

    July 21, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 3

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 4

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 5

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 6

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 7

    Trudeau declares himself ‘proud feminist’ after lamenting Harris loss to Trump as setback for women

    December 13, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (458)
  • Investing (1,601)
  • Politics (1,974)
  • Stocks (668)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved