Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Biden vetoes bill that would have given Trump more judicial seats to fill

by admin December 25, 2024
December 25, 2024
Biden vetoes bill that would have given Trump more judicial seats to fill

President Biden on Monday vetoed a bill that would have added 66 federal district judgeships over a span of more than a decade, a once-bipartisan effort designed so that neither political party would have an advantage in molding the federal judiciary. 

Three presidential administrations, beginning with the incoming Trump administration, and six Congresses would have had the opportunity to appoint the new trial court judgeships, according to the legislation, which had support from organizations representing judges and attorneys.

Despite arguments from the organizations that additional judgeships would help with cases that have seen serious delays in resolution and ease concerns over access to justice, the White House said that Biden would veto the bill.

In a statement, Biden said he made his decision because the ‘hurried action’ by the House of Representatives left open questions about ‘life-tenured’ positions.

‘The House of Representative’s hurried action fails to resolve key questions in the legislation, especially regarding how the new judgeships are allocated, and neither the House of Representatives nor the Senate explored fully how the work of senior status judges and magistrate judges affects the need for new judgeships,’ Biden said.

‘The efficient and effective administration of justice requires that these questions about need and allocation be further studied and answered before we create permanent judgeships for life-tenured judges,’ Biden added.

He said the bill would also have created new judgeships in states where senators have not filled existing judicial vacancies and that those efforts ‘suggest that concerns about judicial economy and caseload are not the true motivating force behind passage of this bill now.

When Biden’s plan to veto the legislation surfaced earlier this month, Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., told ‘America’s Newsroom’ that the act is ‘the last spasm of a lame-duck.’

‘President Biden and his team don’t want to allow it to become law simply because a Republican administration would get to appoint some of the judges,’ Kennedy said. 

‘I wish they’d put the country first,’ the senator added.

The legislation was passed unanimously in August under the Democratic-controlled Senate, though the Republican-led House brought the measure to the floor only after Donald Trump was reelected president in November, creating an air of political gamesmanship.

Biden’s veto essentially shelves the legislation for the current Congress. 

Overturning Biden’s veto would require a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate, and the House vote fell well short of that margin.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Dozens of House lawmakers rally around funding Afghan visa program as Trump vows major spending cuts
next post
Netanyahu warns Houthis amid calls for Israel to wipe out terror leadership as it did with Nasrallah, Sinwar

Related Posts

DAVID MARCUS: Calling Rep. Sarah McBride ‘mister’ isn’t...

March 13, 2025

Trump charges ahead with agenda in week 10...

March 25, 2025

Timeshare terror leaves retired couple $50K in the...

December 25, 2024

DNI Gabbard refers intel officials to DOJ for...

April 24, 2025

Senate Dems rail against ‘shadow speaker’ billionaire Elon...

December 21, 2024

Trump State Department declares Tren de Aragua, MS-13,...

February 20, 2025

Trump says Biden admin. ‘knows what is happening’...

December 17, 2024

DC food workers pledge to make Trump officials...

December 14, 2024

Future of Trump budget bill uncertain as House...

April 9, 2025

Energy chief envisions US nuclear renaissance: restoring ‘pit’...

March 31, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Unlock the Power of StockCharts’ NEW Market Summary Dashboard | Walkthrough & Tips
  • Market Maker Manipulation; Oops, They Did It Again!
  • 50% of S&P 500 Stocks Just Turned Bullish – What Happens Next?
  • Bullish Breadth Improvement Suggests Further Upside For Stocks
  • Tariff Tensions Ease, Nasdaq Soars — But is SMH the Emerging Leader?

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • Unlock the Power of StockCharts’ NEW Market Summary Dashboard | Walkthrough & Tips

    May 14, 2025
  • Market Maker Manipulation; Oops, They Did It Again!

    May 14, 2025
  • 50% of S&P 500 Stocks Just Turned Bullish – What Happens Next?

    May 14, 2025
  • Bullish Breadth Improvement Suggests Further Upside For Stocks

    May 14, 2025
  • Tariff Tensions Ease, Nasdaq Soars — But is SMH the Emerging Leader?

    May 14, 2025
  • Trump’s ‘wrong-headed’ effort to lower drug costs amounts to price control: expert

    May 14, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 3

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Trudeau declares himself ‘proud feminist’ after lamenting Harris loss to Trump as setback for women

    December 13, 2024
  • 6

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 7

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (347)
  • Investing (1,114)
  • Politics (1,386)
  • Stocks (439)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved