Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Trump’s plan to slash ‘woke’ foreign aid, NPR funds clears House as Senate battle looms

by admin June 13, 2025
June 13, 2025
Trump’s plan to slash ‘woke’ foreign aid, NPR funds clears House as Senate battle looms

The House of Representatives passed President Donald Trump’s $9.4 billion plan to claw back federal funds for foreign aid, PBS and NPR.

The 214 to 212 vote was mostly along party lines, with no Democrats voting for the bill. Four Republicans voted against the measure, however – Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., Mike Turner, R-Ohio, Mark Amodei, R-Nev., and Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y.

A dramatic scene played out on the House floor on Thursday afternoon as the bill appeared poised to fail, with six Republican lawmakers having voted ‘no.’

Fox News Digital observed Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., huddled with several moderate Republicans who either voted ‘no’ or had not yet voted.

In the end, two of those holdouts – Reps. Nick LaLota, R-N.Y., and Don Bacon, R-Neb. – elected to support the bill, enabling it to pass on a narrow margin.

Trump allies largely viewed the package as a test run to see whether congressional Republicans could stomach cuts that were widely seen across the GOP as low-hanging fruit.

Spending cuts in the legislation include a $8.3 billion rollback of funding to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and just over $1 billion in cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funnels federal dollars to NPR and PBS.

Republican leaders argued the majority of the USAID dollars getting cut were going toward ‘woke’ programs like $1 million for voter ID in Haiti and $3 million for Iraqi Sesame Street.

On NPR and PBS, conservatives have long accused the two networks of taking federal money while growing increasingly liberal in their bias, rather than focusing on impartiality.

But some moderate Republicans had concerns about the legislation’s effect on critical disease prevention research in Africa.

Others argue that entirely slashing federal funding to public broadcasting would disproportionately hurt small local news outlets that rely on it most, and which are situated in areas that otherwise would be an information desert without those resources.

The legislation ultimately passed, however, and will now be sent to the Senate for consideration.

The $9.4 billion proposal is called a rescissions package, a mechanism for the White House to block congressionally approved funding it disagrees with.

Once transmitted to Capitol Hill, lawmakers have 45 days to approve the rescissions proposal, otherwise it is considered rejected. 

Such measures only need a simple majority in the House and Senate to pass. But that’s no easy feat with Republicans’ thin majorities in both chambers.

If passed, Republican leaders hope the bill will be the first of several rescissions packages codifying spending cuts identified by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Mike Lawler tells NY Dem to ‘f— off’ after chaos ignites on House floor
next post
RRG Update: Is Tech Ready to Break Out?

Related Posts

Who is Anita Dunn? The Biden confidante who...

August 8, 2025

Former FBI and CIA chief urges senators to...

December 28, 2024

‘Another endless conflict’: Democrat echoes Trump’s anti-war stance...

June 17, 2025

Trump administration moves decisively to block China from...

July 9, 2025

Trump, Biden react to death of former President...

December 30, 2024

SCOTUS allows Trump to fire Biden-appointed FTC commissioner

September 23, 2025

Trump announces new ‘serious power’ fighter jets for...

April 30, 2025

Huckabee hits back at Western countries that ‘side’...

July 23, 2025

Nuclear watchdog urges ‘trust but verify’ that Iran...

April 24, 2025

Trump’s proposed US takeover of Gaza Strip elicits...

February 5, 2025

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio
  • Five possible futures for Middle East from renaissance to rockets
  • ‘Untold damage’: Global assisted suicide movement targets children
  • Two IDF soldiers killed amid ‘severe’ ceasefire violation, ‘it’s not the last,’ analyst says

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    October 20, 2025
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    October 20, 2025
  • Five possible futures for Middle East from renaissance to rockets

    October 20, 2025
  • ‘Untold damage’: Global assisted suicide movement targets children

    October 20, 2025
  • Two IDF soldiers killed amid ‘severe’ ceasefire violation, ‘it’s not the last,’ analyst says

    October 20, 2025
  • Is Trump’s ‘heat’ on Venezuela the start of a wider campaign for regime change?

    October 20, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 3

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 4

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 5

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 6

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 7

    Trudeau declares himself ‘proud feminist’ after lamenting Harris loss to Trump as setback for women

    December 13, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (579)
  • Investing (2,225)
  • Politics (2,716)
  • Stocks (852)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved