Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Conservative rips blue state Republican’s proposal to raise taxes on wealthy in SALT debate

by admin May 20, 2025
May 20, 2025
Conservative rips blue state Republican’s proposal to raise taxes on wealthy in SALT debate

A conservative Republican said he’s opposed to his moderate colleague’s proposal for a modest tax hike on high-income earners, as GOP lawmakers continue to navigate divisions over President Donald Trump’s ‘one big, beautiful bill.’

‘Well, think about that — higher taxes to pay for something that is pretty much self-inflicted by all the states that don’t have their financials in order,’ Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, told Fox News Digital on Sunday.

It comes as various House Republican factions are locked in high-stakes debates on taxes, Medicaid, and green energy subsidies while crafting Trump’s wide-ranging bill.

Rep. Nick LaLota, R-N.Y., suggested over the weekend that increasing the top tax bracket to a 39.6% income tax rate rather than 37% could help pay for higher deduction caps for state and local taxes (SALT).

The 39.6% rate refers to the top income tax bracket before it was lowered by Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).

SALT deduction caps primarily benefit people living in high-cost-of-living areas like New York City, Los Angeles, and their surrounding suburbs.

Republicans representing those areas, including LaLota, have argued that raising the SALT deduction cap is an existential issue — and that a failure to address it could cost the GOP the House majority in the 2026 midterms.

Several of the Republicans vying for higher SALT deduction caps have pointed out that their victories are critical to the party retaining control of the House in 2024.

SALT deduction caps did not exist before TCJA, which notably instilled a $10,000 ceiling for married and single tax filers.

‘The One Big Beautiful Bill has stalled—and it needs wind in its sails. Allowing the top tax rate to expire—returning from 37% to 39.6% for individuals earning over $609,350 and married couples earning over $731,200—breathes $300 billion of new life into the effort,’ LaLota wrote on X.

‘It’s a fiscally responsible move that reflects the priorities of the new Republican Party: protect working families, address the deficit, fix the unfair SALT cap, and safeguard programs like Medicaid and SNAP—without raising taxes on the middle class.’

But Republicans in lower-tax states are largely wary of significant increases to those caps, believing them to incentivize blue states’ high-tax policies.

‘People with money invest, and to tax them more — history has been, when you tax the other upper 1% more, you know, the economy does worse,’ Norman argued. ‘More taxes don’t make sense to me.’

The current legislation would increase the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $30,000, but a majority of Republicans in the House SALT Caucus rejected the deal.

LaLota and others have contended it’s not enough for middle-class families in their districts.

‘My party’s $30K cap proposal only makes 4 in 5 households whole. That’s not enough. On [Long Island], $250K isn’t rich—it barely covers the basics. Too many families pay over $15K in property taxes & get left out. I’m fighting for a higher cap. Wish me luck,’ he said on X.

But while tax hike proposals targeting wealthy Americans were part of Republicans’ negotiations at an earlier point, any such effort appears to have been all but definitively stamped out. 

House GOP leadership aides signaled to reporters on Monday morning that such a tax hike would not be in the final bill, pointing to Speaker Mike Johnson’s comments on the matter.

Johnson, R-La., said on The Will Cain Show late last month that he was ‘not in favor of raising the tax rates, because our party is the group that stands against that, traditionally.’

But nevertheless, the differing viewpoints underscore the divisions that Republicans still have to navigate ahead of their planned House-wide vote on Trump’s bill later this week.

Republicans are using the budget reconciliation process to advance Trump’s priorities on taxes, immigration, energy, defense and the national debt via one massive bill.

Budget reconciliation lowers the Senate’s threshold for passage from 60 votes to 51, thereby allowing the party in power to skirt the minority — in this case, Democrats — to pass sweeping pieces of legislation, provided they deal with the federal budget, taxation or the national debt.

Republican leaders want to have a final bill on the president’s desk by Fourth of July.

Fox News Digital reached out to LaLota’s office for comment on Norman’s remarks but did not immediately hear back.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Schumer ripped for placing blame on Trump, DOGE for deadly Mexican Navy crash in NYC: ‘He is an idiot’
next post
Not All Price Gaps Are the Same! Here’s How to Trade Them

Related Posts

Newly surfaced report provides more clues on COVID...

April 11, 2025

Musk signals potential softening of feud with simple...

June 10, 2025

Judge blocks Trump from placing 2,200 USAID workers...

February 9, 2025

Several provisions fail to pass muster with Senate...

June 21, 2025

Trump report card: Conservative and liberal analysts reveal...

March 4, 2025

Here’s what happened during President Donald Trump’s 4th...

February 15, 2025

2 lone Republicans vote against Trump’s ‘big, beautiful...

July 4, 2025

EPA places numerous employees on leave for alleged...

July 4, 2025

Trump official travels to Venezuela to negotiate deal...

February 1, 2025

Biden says he’s been carrying out ‘most aggressive...

January 15, 2025

Recent Posts

  • The Best Five Sectors, #26
  • US champions Lebanon’s response to Hezbollah disarmament, hints at Abraham Accords opportunity
  • Liberal critics question why architect of failed Biden foreign policy is advising ‘Project 2029’
  • Sen. Steve Daines says regime change is the best long-term plan in Iran
  • Bondi under siege after DOJ reveals no Epstein client list

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • The Best Five Sectors, #26

    July 8, 2025
  • US champions Lebanon’s response to Hezbollah disarmament, hints at Abraham Accords opportunity

    July 8, 2025
  • Liberal critics question why architect of failed Biden foreign policy is advising ‘Project 2029’

    July 8, 2025
  • Sen. Steve Daines says regime change is the best long-term plan in Iran

    July 8, 2025
  • Bondi under siege after DOJ reveals no Epstein client list

    July 8, 2025
  • Over 158 million Americans voted in 2024 as Trump reclaimed the White House

    July 8, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 3

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 6

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 7

    Trudeau declares himself ‘proud feminist’ after lamenting Harris loss to Trump as setback for women

    December 13, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (443)
  • Investing (1,505)
  • Politics (1,865)
  • Stocks (633)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved