Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

DAVID MARCUS: Sorry Dems, literally nobody believes married women can’t get IDs

by admin April 13, 2025
April 13, 2025
DAVID MARCUS: Sorry Dems, literally nobody believes married women can’t get IDs
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The latest ridiculous lie from Democrats about how Republicans are driving the country towards fascism is out, and it is a doozy. This time, we are meant to believe that Trump and the GOP are banning married women from voting.

Spoiler Alert: They aren’t.

Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., and others took to video this week to make the nonsensical and logically tortured claim, saying, ‘House Republicans’ so-called ‘SAVE Act’ blocks nearly 70 million women from registering to vote—just because they changed their name after marriage.’

Here is what failed glass-ceiling breaker Hillary Clinton had to say: ‘The House just passed the Republican voter suppression measure that threatens voting access for millions of Americans, including 69 million women whose married names don’t match their birth certificates.’

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act requires prrof of citizenship to cast a vote in federal elections. Among the acceptable documents for demonstrating proof of citizenship are: A REAL ID-compliant driver’s license, a valid U.S. passport, and a military ID.

You would think the driver’s license requirement would be simple enough, but then again, blue-state Democrats screwed that up when they insisted on giving driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants whose supporting documents could not be verified. Now, the rest of us have to get extra verification for our driver’s licenses so they can be distinguished from the ones handed out like candy to illegal aliens.

So now, Democrats are seriously suggesting that married women in our country are all but incapable of obtaining verified identification and therefore will be disenfranchised by Republicans, presumably while they twist their handlebar mustaches and kick some puppies.

I’d like to ask Rep. Swalwell, if married women are incapable of getting IDs such as a driver’s license, then why is there an almost endless line of them in cars in front of me at the school pick-up line?

Furthermore, I am given to understand that married women quite regularly travel abroad. If they can’t get a passport, then how is this happening? Are their husbands bribing border officials?

… there are approximately 70 million married women in the United States who may have taken their spouse’s last name, which means there are 70 million Americans who know damn well how easily they can obtain valid ID.

If, in fact, there is some intractable issue preventing married women from getting ID, then we should fix it. But given that nobody had ever heard of this ‘major problem’ until Republicans brought up a voter ID law, it is, well, suspicious.

This is especially true, given that up to 80% of Americans support showing valid ID to vote, yet instead of honoring the will of the people, the left, once again, goes charging towards facile identity politics.

You have to hand it to the Democrats. When they latch onto a message, they immediately start yelling it in unison with all the subtlety of a sky-writing competition, like last month, when they all started cursing like Andrew Dice Clay one day.

As cosmically stupid and demonstrably false as it is, this claim that married women will be disparately impacted, or uniquely disadvantaged by the voter ID law is par for a very dangerous course that the Democrats run over and over.

According to the Democrats, we can’t have safer streets because minorities or the poor will be arrested more often, we can’t protect women in sports because that violates trans rights and now we can’t secure the vote because married women don’t know how to get IDs.

This is all ‘disparate impact ad absurdum.’ if there is one non-white, non-straight, non-cis person in America who faces a negative consequence from legislation, then the whole thing has to be tanked. 

Meanwhile, Democrats push policies like student debt relief that clearly disadvantages Americans who never went to college, but in this case somehow the discrimination is enlightened.

The final nail in the coffin of this insane notion that the GOP wants to disenfranchise everyone with ‘Mrs.’ in front of her name, or in Democrats opinion, his or her name, is that married women lean Republican in their voting.

In fact, recent polling has shown that with full voter participation, the Republicans and Trump would have won by even more in 2024, so why on earth would the GOP want to leave those votes on the table?

Ultimately, what the Democrats have here is a reality problem. As Swalwell pointed out, there are approximately 70 million married women in the United States who may have taken their spouse’s last name, which means there are 70 million Americans who know damn well how easily they can obtain valid ID.

So get out there and vote, married ladies. There is literally nothing stopping you.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Here’s what happened during Trump’s 12th week in office
next post
New US Tariffs and Intensifying US–China Trade War: Economic Implications and Opportunities for India

Related Posts

Teen street musician jailed for leading anti-Putin song...

October 17, 2025

Vance: Adversaries are ‘afraid’ of US military, and...

August 14, 2025

Iran says it has ‘plenty of scientists’ left...

August 2, 2025

Jimmy Carter’s funeral will bring all five living...

January 9, 2025

Pentagon calls Charlie Kirk posts ‘domestic terrorism’; Dem...

September 16, 2025

‘False’: Trump admin rebukes claims intel officials are...

April 3, 2025

Putin vows victory in Ukraine in New Year’s...

January 1, 2026

Trump wins over lifelong Democrat autoworker with ‘big,...

June 27, 2025

House witness flips script on Dem who ambushed...

June 8, 2025

Dem senator plows ahead with war powers resolution...

June 25, 2025

Recent Posts

  • 171 million travelers face airport delays as Democrats’ DHS shutdown hits TSA staffing, Scalise warns
  • FDA launches new AI-powered system to track drug and vaccine side effects nationwide
  • Cornyn reverses on filibuster stance to push Trump’s SAVE Act in Senate
  • DAVID MARCUS: Sen Thune has no idea how mad the GOP base is at him
  • Trump touts 5-0 sweep by endorsed candidates in Tuesday primary elections

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • 171 million travelers face airport delays as Democrats’ DHS shutdown hits TSA staffing, Scalise warns

    March 12, 2026
  • FDA launches new AI-powered system to track drug and vaccine side effects nationwide

    March 12, 2026
  • Cornyn reverses on filibuster stance to push Trump’s SAVE Act in Senate

    March 12, 2026
  • DAVID MARCUS: Sen Thune has no idea how mad the GOP base is at him

    March 12, 2026
  • Trump touts 5-0 sweep by endorsed candidates in Tuesday primary elections

    March 12, 2026
  • US destroys 16 Iranian mine boats as Strait of Hormuz oil showdown escalates

    March 12, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 2

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 3

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 4

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 7

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (630)
  • Investing (3,251)
  • Politics (3,955)
  • Stocks (1,072)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2026 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved