Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Tulsi Gabbard changes tune on controversial intelligence tool following GOP lobbying

by admin January 11, 2025
January 11, 2025
Tulsi Gabbard changes tune on controversial intelligence tool following GOP lobbying

Tulsi Gabbard, who is President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to be Director of National Intelligence (DNI) in his next administration, has reversed course on a controversial item after lobbying from Republican senators. 

Gabbard revealed on Friday that she believes section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) ‘is crucial for gathering foreign intelligence on non-U.S. persons abroad.’

She previously opposed FISA section 702 re-authorization while serving as a Democrat in the House of Representatives. 

‘We have a very important responsibility to strike a balance between national security to keep the American people safe, while also protecting our constitutionally protected freedoms,’ she said on the House floor in 2018. ‘Let us make this critical choice. Vote to keep our country safe. Vote to uphold our constitutional rights that so many have fought and died to protect.’

In her statement, provided by a Trump transition spokesperson, Gabbard said, ‘This unique capability cannot be replicated and must be safeguarded to protect our nation while ensuring the civil liberties of Americans.’

‘My prior concerns about FISA were based on insufficient protections for civil liberties, particularly regarding the FBI’s misuse of warrantless search powers on American citizens. Significant FISA reforms have been enacted since my time in Congress to address these issues. If confirmed as DNI, I will uphold Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights while maintaining vital national security tools like Section 702 to ensure the safety and freedom of the American people,’ she said. 

The change in Gabbard’s beliefs on the key national security issue was first reported by Punchbowl News. 

It comes after multiple Republican senators made the case to her of the importance of FISA’s section 702. 

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, told Fox News Digital in a statement: ‘Tulsi Gabbard has assured me in our conversations that she supports Section 702 as recently amended and that she will follow the law and support its reauthorization as DNI.’

One GOP aide shared that during his meeting with Gabbard, Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., emphasized how important the authority granted by section 702 is, and how important her navigation of it would be. 

In a podcast appearance earlier this week, Lankford told the Wall Street Journal’s Kim Strassel that there were some issues ‘that people aren’t talking about’ as it relates to Trump’s picks. One of them, he said, was Gabbard and her stance on section 702. 

‘She has voted against what’s called 702 authority every time that she was in Congress and voted against it. Well, now she’s going to be the spokesman for 702 authority. It’s a legitimate question just to say, ‘Okay, how are you going to handle this?’’ he asked. 

Lankford suggested that this is something that matters to other Republican senators. ‘I don’t hear anyone really coming up publicly and saying, ‘I’m adamantly opposed” to Trump’s nominees, he explained. 

But, ‘What I hear is a lot of people saying, ‘Hey, I want to give a fair hearing. I want people to be able to answer questions publicly.’’ 

While most GOP senators are supportive of FISA, some have been vocal critics. ‘Voting to reauthorize FISA 702 without a warrant requirement is difficult to defend. So are those casting such votes—especially if they purport to care about the Fourth Amendment,’ Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, wrote on X ahead of the most recent FISA re-authorization. 

Another top critic, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said in 2023, ‘Using 702, Americans’ communications content and metadata is inevitably swept up and kept in government databases without a warrant. Law enforcement agencies then access Americans’ communications without a warrant.’ 

These Republicans may not be as happy about Gabbard’s change of heart. However, there isn’t any indication that it would harm their support for her as of yet. 

One Republican senate source cast doubt on Gabbard’s new stance, noting that she has been ‘a life-long skeptic of intelligence gathering.’ They suggested it is unlikely that she has ‘completely changed her mind.’ 

A GOP Senate source confirmed to Fox News Digital that conservative senators are encouraged by Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and his apparent desire to confirm Trump nominees on the day he is sworn into office. 

The group is eager to have all national security nominees confirmed on Trump’s first day, they added. 

Related Topics

  • Politics
  • Senate
  • Trump Transition
  • Tulsi Gabbard
  • National Security
This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Dems eerily silent on Trump sentencing as they prepare for Republican trifecta in Washington
next post
DOGE reps launch meetings with federal staffers in effort to cut government waste: report

Related Posts

Who is the conservative ‘superstar’ lawyer and potential...

February 26, 2025

Trump says public entitlements like Social Security, Medicaid...

May 1, 2025

Trump signs order instructing DOGE to massively cut...

February 12, 2025

China unveils world’s largest amphibious warship

December 28, 2024

US continues to share data to protect Ukrainians...

March 8, 2025

Trump, Putin on same page about Iran’s nuclear...

March 19, 2025

Top agency staffer trying to block crucial Trump...

March 27, 2025

Booker delivers record Senate speech against Trump admin,...

April 2, 2025

National Cancer Institute spends $218M per year on...

February 24, 2025

US will know in ‘matter of weeks’ if...

April 5, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Breakouts, Momentum & Moving Averages: 10 Must-See Stock Charts Right Now
  • Hedge Market Volatility with These Dividend Aristocrats & Sector Leaders
  • S&P 500 Bullish Patterns: Are Higher Highs Ahead?
  • Strategic Chaos or Tactical Goldmine? What QQQ’s Chart is Whispering Right Now
  • Why ADX Can Mislead You — And How to Avoid It

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • Breakouts, Momentum & Moving Averages: 10 Must-See Stock Charts Right Now

    June 5, 2025
  • Hedge Market Volatility with These Dividend Aristocrats & Sector Leaders

    June 5, 2025
  • S&P 500 Bullish Patterns: Are Higher Highs Ahead?

    June 5, 2025
  • Strategic Chaos or Tactical Goldmine? What QQQ’s Chart is Whispering Right Now

    June 5, 2025
  • Why ADX Can Mislead You — And How to Avoid It

    June 5, 2025
  • S&P 500 on the Verge of 6,000: What’s at Stake?

    June 5, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 3

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Trudeau declares himself ‘proud feminist’ after lamenting Harris loss to Trump as setback for women

    December 13, 2024
  • 7

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (388)
  • Investing (1,273)
  • Politics (1,577)
  • Stocks (525)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved