Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Biden vetoes bill that would have given Trump more judicial seats to fill

by admin December 25, 2024
December 25, 2024
Biden vetoes bill that would have given Trump more judicial seats to fill

President Biden on Monday vetoed a bill that would have added 66 federal district judgeships over a span of more than a decade, a once-bipartisan effort designed so that neither political party would have an advantage in molding the federal judiciary. 

Three presidential administrations, beginning with the incoming Trump administration, and six Congresses would have had the opportunity to appoint the new trial court judgeships, according to the legislation, which had support from organizations representing judges and attorneys.

Despite arguments from the organizations that additional judgeships would help with cases that have seen serious delays in resolution and ease concerns over access to justice, the White House said that Biden would veto the bill.

In a statement, Biden said he made his decision because the ‘hurried action’ by the House of Representatives left open questions about ‘life-tenured’ positions.

‘The House of Representative’s hurried action fails to resolve key questions in the legislation, especially regarding how the new judgeships are allocated, and neither the House of Representatives nor the Senate explored fully how the work of senior status judges and magistrate judges affects the need for new judgeships,’ Biden said.

‘The efficient and effective administration of justice requires that these questions about need and allocation be further studied and answered before we create permanent judgeships for life-tenured judges,’ Biden added.

He said the bill would also have created new judgeships in states where senators have not filled existing judicial vacancies and that those efforts ‘suggest that concerns about judicial economy and caseload are not the true motivating force behind passage of this bill now.

When Biden’s plan to veto the legislation surfaced earlier this month, Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., told ‘America’s Newsroom’ that the act is ‘the last spasm of a lame-duck.’

‘President Biden and his team don’t want to allow it to become law simply because a Republican administration would get to appoint some of the judges,’ Kennedy said. 

‘I wish they’d put the country first,’ the senator added.

The legislation was passed unanimously in August under the Democratic-controlled Senate, though the Republican-led House brought the measure to the floor only after Donald Trump was reelected president in November, creating an air of political gamesmanship.

Biden’s veto essentially shelves the legislation for the current Congress. 

Overturning Biden’s veto would require a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate, and the House vote fell well short of that margin.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Dozens of House lawmakers rally around funding Afghan visa program as Trump vows major spending cuts
next post
Netanyahu warns Houthis amid calls for Israel to wipe out terror leadership as it did with Nasrallah, Sinwar

Related Posts

America celebrates Irish culture and politics on St....

March 18, 2025

White House says it didn’t create a banned...

March 19, 2025

Who is Norm Eisen? Meet the anti-Trump attorney...

February 9, 2025

EXCLUSIVE: Trump warns major Dem against move that...

February 25, 2025

Hegseth says Defense Dept eliminates hundreds of millions...

March 21, 2025

Trump must not repeat his Kim Jong Un...

February 9, 2025

Top agency staffer trying to block crucial Trump...

March 27, 2025

Federal judge denies Trump admin’s effort to ban...

March 27, 2025

Trump directs agencies to follow Supreme Court rulings,...

April 16, 2025

‘JOE, YOU’RE FIRED’: President Trump revokes Biden’s security...

February 8, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Unlock the Power of StockCharts’ NEW Market Summary Dashboard | Walkthrough & Tips
  • 50% of S&P 500 Stocks Just Turned Bullish – What Happens Next?
  • How to Use Relative Strength in a Volatile Market
  • The S&P 500 Snapped Back Hard: Now What?
  • SMCI Stock Rebounds: Why Its SCTR Score is Screaming for Attention

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • Unlock the Power of StockCharts’ NEW Market Summary Dashboard | Walkthrough & Tips

    May 15, 2025
  • 50% of S&P 500 Stocks Just Turned Bullish – What Happens Next?

    May 15, 2025
  • How to Use Relative Strength in a Volatile Market

    May 15, 2025
  • The S&P 500 Snapped Back Hard: Now What?

    May 15, 2025
  • SMCI Stock Rebounds: Why Its SCTR Score is Screaming for Attention

    May 15, 2025
  • Key Biden agency dropped $60K on overseas conference with DEI workshop: ‘Should never happen’

    May 15, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 3

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 4

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Trudeau declares himself ‘proud feminist’ after lamenting Harris loss to Trump as setback for women

    December 13, 2024
  • 7

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (349)
  • Investing (1,124)
  • Politics (1,396)
  • Stocks (444)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved