Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges

by admin December 25, 2024
December 25, 2024
Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges

A top ally of President Biden is ‘disappointed’ after he vetoed a bill that would have increased the number of federal judges currently serving.

Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., who served as a campaign co-chair for both of Biden’s recent presidential campaigns, stressed that he and his Republican colleague Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., kept bipartisanship top of mind when crafting the bill.

‘I am disappointed by this outcome, for my own state and for the federal judges throughout the country struggling under the burden of ever-higher caseloads. I’ve worked on this bill for years, and thanks to tireless bipartisan effort with Senator Young, it made it to the president’s desk. It’s highly unfortunate that it will not become law,’ Coons said in a statement on Tuesday.

He then put the blame on House Republicans for the bill’s ultimate failure, however, for voting on it after the 2024 election.

‘Senator Young and I took pains to make this a nonpartisan process, structuring the JUDGES Act so that Congress could pass the bill before any of us – Republican or Democrat – knew who would occupy the White House in 2025 and therefore nominate the new federal judges,’ Coons said.

‘The Senate did its part by passing the bill unanimously in August; the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, however, waited for election results before moving the bill forward. As a result, the White House is now vetoing this bill.’

Republicans in turn have accused Biden of making threats to veto the bill – which he issued two days before the House voted on it – to avoid giving President-elect Trump new roles to fill.

‘This important legislation garnered broad, bipartisan support when it unanimously passed the Senate in August because it directly addresses the pressing need to reduce case backlogs in our federal courts and strengthen the efficiency of our judicial system,’ Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., pointed out in a statement after the bill passed earlier this month.

 ‘At that time, Democrats supported the bill – they thought Kamala Harris would win the presidency. Now, however, the Biden-Harris administration has chosen to issue a veto threat and Democrats have whipped against this bill, standing in the way of progress, simply because of partisan politics.’

The bill would have added 66 federal district judicial roles, spreading their creation out over more than 10 years to prevent a boon on new appointments for any one administration. 

At the time of its Senate passage, Democrats’ morale was high after Biden ducked out of the 2024 race and was replaced by Vice President Kamala Harris.

It passed the Senate with unanimous consent, however, meaning no Republicans objected to the legislation’s advancement.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
US citizen imprisoned in Russia given new 15-year sentence in wake of espionage conviction
next post
AI is reshaping business. This is how we stay ahead of China

Related Posts

Grenell lights up Susan Rice for years of...

March 3, 2025

‘American hero’ or ‘failure’: Elon Musk’s DOGE departure...

May 31, 2025

Trump FDA nominee turns vaccine question on Dem,...

March 7, 2025

Elon Musk warns excessive spending will plunge US...

June 4, 2025

‘Just evil’: Top Republican details Russia’s ‘horrific’ mass...

January 25, 2025

US troops in the Middle East could face...

June 20, 2025

Iran to suspend work with UN nuclear watchdog,...

July 3, 2025

Netanyahu shows picture of Bibas family at combat...

February 24, 2025

SCOOP: Mike Johnson meeting House Judiciary Committee as...

March 25, 2025

Conservatives flip script on Senate Dems pushing identical...

March 5, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Tariff Shock Spurs “Buy-the-Dip” Setups in Tesla and ON Semiconductor
  • New book reveals what top ex-Biden aide was thinking during disastrous debate
  • TSA expected to end shoes-off policy at many airports across US
  • Trump administration moves decisively to block China from ‘weaponizing’ American farmland
  • Trump dishes on Milley clash over leaving military equipment in Afghanistan: ‘I knew he was an idiot’

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • Tariff Shock Spurs “Buy-the-Dip” Setups in Tesla and ON Semiconductor

    July 9, 2025
  • New book reveals what top ex-Biden aide was thinking during disastrous debate

    July 9, 2025
  • TSA expected to end shoes-off policy at many airports across US

    July 9, 2025
  • Trump administration moves decisively to block China from ‘weaponizing’ American farmland

    July 9, 2025
  • Trump dishes on Milley clash over leaving military equipment in Afghanistan: ‘I knew he was an idiot’

    July 9, 2025
  • TikToker knocks Harris’ ‘weird’ take on never released interview: ‘Not good’

    July 9, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 3

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 4

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
  • 5

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 6

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 7

    Trudeau declares himself ‘proud feminist’ after lamenting Harris loss to Trump as setback for women

    December 13, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (445)
  • Investing (1,513)
  • Politics (1,875)
  • Stocks (634)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved