Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

Republicans, Democrats say no to US military strike against Iran as Trump mulls action: poll

by admin January 15, 2026
January 15, 2026
Republicans, Democrats say no to US military strike against Iran as Trump mulls action: poll

Democrats and Republicans are united in opposing U.S. military strikes against Iran to retaliate for the killing of protesters amid a wave of massive demonstrations against the Iranian government in recent weeks, according to a new national poll.

Seventy percent of voters questioned in a new Quinnipiac University survey said they think the U.S. should not get involved militarily in Iran, with 18% saying the U.S. should take military action.

The vast majority of Independents (80%-11%) and Democrats (79%-7%), as well as a majority of Republicans (53%-35%) said the U.S. should not get involved if protesters in Iran are killed while demonstrating against the regime.

The poll, conducted Jan. 9–12, comes as President Donald Trump has turned up the heat on the regime in Tehran, threatening strikes on Iran if its forces continue to kill demonstrators.

The U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency announced Tuesday that nearly 2,000 people have been killed in the protests. Other reports say the death toll is over 3,000, with the real number likely to be even higher. 

The protests against Iran’s dire economic conditions, which have rapidly escalated in recent days, are seen as some of the most violent since the 1979 Islamic Revolution that installed the current system of clerical rule.

Trump took to social media earlier this week, urging ‘Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING — TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS.’

The president also said that ‘HELP IS ON ITS WAY,’ and apparently pointing to Iranian authorities, he warned, ‘They will pay a big price.’

Pointing to the possibility of Iranian authorities executing some of the protesters, Trump said in a CBS News interview this week, ‘If they do such a thing, we will take very strong action.’

And the White House confirmed on Monday that Trump was weighing whether to bomb Iran in reaction to the crackdown.

But seven in 10 questioned in the poll said that, in general, a president should first receive congressional approval before deciding to take military action against another country.

‘Talk of the U.S. military potentially intervening in Iran’s internal chaos gets a vigorous thumbs down, while voters signal congressional approval should be a backstop against military involvement in any foreign crisis,’ Quinnipiac University polling analyst Tim Malloy said.

But there’s a partisan divide, with 95% of Democrats and 78% of Independents saying a president should first receive approval from Congress, but Republicans, by a 54%-35% margin, saying congressional approval is not needed.

Trump last June ordered U.S. military strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities as part of Operation Midnight Hammer, amid fighting between Tehran and Israel.

Voters are also divided on Trump’s move earlier this month to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife and bring them to the U.S. to face drug trafficking charges. Forty-seven percent supported the president’s decision, with 45% opposed.

And there was an expected partisan divide, with 85% of Republicans supporting the military action to capture Maduro, with 79% of Democrats opposed. Independents were divided.

More than half of voters (57%) opposed the U.S. running Venezuela until Washington is satisfied that the government there will operate the way the U.S. wants it to. Nearly three-quarters (73%) said they opposed sending U.S. ground troops to Venezuela and 55% opposed the U.S. taking over the South American country’s oil sales.

‘Voters are divided on the merits of overthrowing Maduro. And while split on whether in the long run the people of Venezuela will be better off, they strongly disapprove of America’s temporary domain over Venezuela and are heartily against putting U.S. troops on the ground,’ Malloy noted.

Trump has also turned up the volume in his efforts to acquire Greenland from Denmark.

‘The United States needs Greenland for the purpose of national security,’ the president argued in a social media post Wednesday.

Trump’s push for the U.S. to acquire Greenland is causing tension with Denmark and other NATO allies who insist that the semiautonomous Danish territory should determine its own future. 

Trump officials are openly considering all options, including military force, to take Greenland, spurring bipartisan opposition from some in Congress.

According to the poll, 86% of voters said they would oppose military action to take over Greenland. And by a 55%-37% margin, voters said they opposed trying to buy Greenland.

But there’s a stark political divide, with more than two-thirds of Republicans supporting efforts to buy or capture Greenland.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
GOP senator’s Stop Fraud by SOMALIA Act would force Minnesota fraudsters to repay stolen taxpayer funds
next post
S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

Related Posts

Battleground GOP lawmaker moves to block what he...

January 27, 2026

DAVID MARCUS: Trump’s base trusts him to play...

June 19, 2025

House Republicans split with Trump team over ‘very...

September 6, 2025

DOJ signals crackdown on synagogue protesters using abortion...

February 11, 2026

Parents of American murdered by Hamas make ‘plea’...

February 10, 2025

Federal judges acknowledge court ruling errors tied to...

October 24, 2025

MN lawmaker says ‘unbelievable’ assisted-living fraud scheme includes...

December 18, 2025

Bondi under siege after DOJ reveals no Epstein...

July 8, 2025

Supreme Court hands Ed Sheeran legal win in...

June 17, 2025

Trump set to meet with world leaders in...

February 24, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Team USA’s loudest supporters say FIFA pushed them to upper deck for World Cup
  • Jozy Altidore, now a broadcaster, is bullish on the U.S. making a deep World Cup run
  • Trump administration cites forced labor concerns as grounds for new tariffs
  • Congress invites NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell to testify about league’s use of streaming services
  • Jerome Powell warns politicizing the Federal Reserve would cost public trust

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • Team USA’s loudest supporters say FIFA pushed them to upper deck for World Cup

    June 5, 2026
  • Jozy Altidore, now a broadcaster, is bullish on the U.S. making a deep World Cup run

    June 4, 2026
  • Trump administration cites forced labor concerns as grounds for new tariffs

    June 4, 2026
  • Congress invites NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell to testify about league’s use of streaming services

    June 3, 2026
  • Jerome Powell warns politicizing the Federal Reserve would cost public trust

    June 2, 2026
  • MLB owners have proposed a salary cap for the first time since baseball’s 1994-95 strike

    May 30, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 2

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 3

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 4

    Challenger Gold Doubles Ecuador Resource to 9.1¹ Million Ounces Gold Equivalent²

    April 9, 2025
  • 5

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 6

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 7

    Zelenskyy thanks NATO, European leaders for backing his push to join Trump‑Putin summit

    August 11, 2025
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (687)
  • Investing (3,251)
  • Politics (4,077)
  • Stocks (1,072)
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2026 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved