Bull Hedging
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Investing

Bull Hedging

Politics

FBI scheduling interviews with 6 lawmakers who encouraged military members to refuse ‘illegal orders’

by admin November 26, 2025
November 26, 2025
FBI scheduling interviews with 6 lawmakers who encouraged military members to refuse ‘illegal orders’

The FBI and Department of Justice have contacted Capitol Police to schedule interviews with the six members of Congress who appeared in a controversial video urging service members to ignore orders they may deem illegal, Fox News has learned.

Last week, a group of Democratic lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds, including Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich.; Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz.; Rep. Chris Deluzio, D-Pa.; Rep. Maggie Goodlander, D-N.H.; Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa.; and Rep. Jason Crow released a video directed at service members and intelligence officers stating: ‘Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders.’

In response to the video, President Donald Trump said the lawmakers should be arrested and tried for ‘seditious behavior.’ 

‘SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!’ he said. 

On Monday, the Department of War announced that it has opened a formal review into allegations of misconduct against Kelly over the video. 

The Pentagon said it may even call Kelly, a retired Navy captain, back to active duty to face court-martial proceedings or other administrative actions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Four of the other Democrats are former military, but not retired and therefore are not subject to the UCMJ, according to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, while Slotkin is a former CIA officer.

Hegseth on Tuesday posted on X that the video ‘may seem harmless to civilians — but it carries a different weight inside the military.’

He called the video a ‘politically-motivated influence operation’ and listed reasons for his conclusion, including how the lawmakers never named a specific ‘illegal order,’ which ‘created ambiguity rather than clarity.’ He added that the video used ‘carefully scripted, legal-sounding language’ and argued that the lawmakers ‘subtly reframed military obedience around partisan distrust instead of established legal processes.’

‘In the military, vague rhetoric and ambiguity undermines trust, creates hesitation in the chain of command, and erodes cohesion,’ Hegseth wrote. ‘The military already has clear procedures for handling unlawful orders. It does not need political actors injecting doubt into an already clear chain of command.’ 

He continued: ‘As veterans of various sorts, the Seditious Six knew exactly what they were doing — sowing doubt through a politically-motivated influence operation. The @DeptofWar won’t fall for it or stand for it.’

This is a developing story; check back for updates.

Fox News’ Digital’s Morgan Phillips and Taylor Penley contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Biden-era regulation on the chopping block as Trump-aligned legal group warns of ‘DEI lens’
next post
Dems move to set limits on Trump’s donor-funded White House ballroom, claiming ‘bribery in plain sight’

Related Posts

Trump says he respects Supreme Court’s decision to...

January 10, 2025

Who is Ashley Williams, the longtime Biden aide...

July 12, 2025

House votes for rules to make ousting a...

January 4, 2025

Inside longtime Biden aide’s marathon closed-door grilling in...

July 12, 2025

From Zapruder to smartphones: Assassination footage reshapes America’s...

September 15, 2025

House GOP channels ‘Nighthawks’ as they try to...

May 20, 2025

GOP rebels mutiny against House leaders as Trump...

February 11, 2025

Dems join clergy to pray for ‘moral reckoning’...

June 11, 2025

House Pentagon funding bill would ban transgender treatments...

December 13, 2024

Trump’s nominee to lead US Office of Special...

July 11, 2025

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio
  • Comey expects further legal scrutiny from Trump admin, criticizes ‘fools who would frighten us’
  • Dems move to set limits on Trump’s donor-funded White House ballroom, claiming ‘bribery in plain sight’
  • FBI scheduling interviews with 6 lawmakers who encouraged military members to refuse ‘illegal orders’

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

About Us

About Us

Design Magazine

Welcome to Design Magazine. Follow us for daily & updated design tips, guide and knowledge.

Stay Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Email

Recent Posts

  • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

    November 26, 2025
  • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    November 26, 2025
  • Comey expects further legal scrutiny from Trump admin, criticizes ‘fools who would frighten us’

    November 26, 2025
  • Dems move to set limits on Trump’s donor-funded White House ballroom, claiming ‘bribery in plain sight’

    November 26, 2025
  • FBI scheduling interviews with 6 lawmakers who encouraged military members to refuse ‘illegal orders’

    November 26, 2025
  • Biden-era regulation on the chopping block as Trump-aligned legal group warns of ‘DEI lens’

    November 26, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Small Caps are Set to Skyrocket in 2025—Here’s What You Need to Know

    December 12, 2024
  • 2

    Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

    September 19, 2025
  • 3

    Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in 2025 — if they have sports

    December 31, 2024
  • 4

    Trump leaves China guessing what his next move is with unusual inauguration invitation

    December 15, 2024
  • 5

    Zinc Stocks: 4 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025

    January 15, 2025
  • 6

    Lead Price Forecast: Top Trends for Lead in 2025

    January 11, 2025
  • 7

    Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends That Will Affect Uranium in 2025

    December 19, 2024
Promotion Image

banner

Categories

  • Business (595)
  • Investing (2,501)
  • Politics (3,052)
  • Stocks (926)
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Disclaimer: bullhedging.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2025 bullhedging.com | All Rights Reserved